Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Scheme Liability, Section 10(b), and Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta (1 of 3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
349 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2009

October 5, 2007
Speakers:
Introduction:
Prof. Jonathan H. Adler, Director, Center for Business Law and Regulation, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Dean Reuter, Director of Practice Groups, the Federalist Society
Panel 1:
Moderator: Larry J. Obhof, Associate, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Richard W. Painter, S. Walter Richey Professor in Corporate Law, University of Minnesota Law School
Prof. J. Robert Brown, Jr., University of Denver Sturm College of Law
Barbara Black, Charles Hartsock Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law
Presented by: the Center for Business Law and Regulation
Cosponsored by: Corporate Law Practice Group of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies

Summary: Supreme Court Preview Symposium
Introduction and Panel 1: Scheme Liability under Section 10(b)

On October 9, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, arguably the most important securities law case to reach the Court in a decade. In Stoneridge, the Court will consider whether primary liability under Section 10(b) extends to third-parties, such as auditors, attorneys, or vendors, who engage in allegedly fraudulent transactions with a public corporation.

In Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver (1994), a divided Supreme Court rejected claims of secondary liability under Section 10(b). Stoneridge calls upon the court to revisit Central Bank and reconsider the limits on liability for third-parties in securities litigation.

This case is of tremendous importance to all those with a corporate law or securities practice, as well as those who work with financial services or retirement and pension funds. Numerous trade associations and thirty states, including Ohio, have already participated in the case as amici, with more to follow.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have to do a paper on this case. This video does help, so thanks for posting it.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more