Greg Bahnsen - The Myth of Neutrality (part 3)
Top Comments
All Comments (71)
-
@mathgeek37 All subjects are loaded with implications no matter what they are.
-
He knows kungfu!
-
What's the joke? I'm not sure.
-
Dr? What a joke.
-
I went to three different State schools and they all want to teach you "what to think." It' ridiculous.
-
jealousy is the creator of discrimination.
again, it is up to each of us to consider and respect the other.
i am sure you know, i am merely saying so for anyone else who reads. :D
-
ah, it seems we are more similiar than we both thought at first.
good comment.
-
Okay, I see his point here...
But under which degrees does this policy fall? I certainly haven't found discrimination in the mathematics classroom or the physics classroom? What about chemistry? What about speech pathology? Human resource management? Has secular humanism taken over here as well? Or is it just in classes like history, philosophy, political science, religion and literature?
I think his criticism of university harassment policies is correct. I have wondered if such policies were written with the mindset that white men are the symbols of power and success in American society and we need to be taken down a few notches. Since that archetype is most prevalent in US history, am I right to believe that such policies were written the mindset that we are receiving our "just desserts"?
I have wondered that for years.
mathgeek37 2 years ago 5
But the testing itself relies on those core assumptions. Which means that you will be testing your core assumptions against your core assumptions.
How's that work, exactly?
DetectiveTackett 3 years ago 2