Coast to Coast AM - 11 of 11 - 9/11 Debate (Aug. 21, 2010)

Info: http://world911truth.org - Richard Gage, from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Dave Thomas, a physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason, joined Ian Punnett for the entire program to debate the idea of controlled demolition of buildings on 9/11

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Richard Gage
• Dave Thomas
• 9/11
• 911
• AE911Truth
• Nanothermite
• controlled demolition

[tagalder70]

Ian Punnett really sucks.

[klnine]

dave thomas is an idiot !

[dsemencar]

11:30 "Dave and I agree that planes hit the towers." What an idiot Gage...

[152czar]

Someone is clearly lying here. Although they manage to remain civil, Gage and Thomas agree on virtually no facts. So we are left in doubt as to what the facts are.

This leaves us, the listeners in doubt as to what happened. And when in doubt investigate.

Clearly, Richard Gage clearly won this debate because he wants another investigation.

[152czar]

@chrisjames1962 That's false. Look up the wikipedia article for "House Select Committee on Assassinations."

[DGoose33]

I really don't like conspiracies, mostly because the majority of them are ridiculous. But when the accepted truth makes less sense than the conspiracy I think it's worth checking out. The fact that I thought was most interesting was that steel framed high rises have never collapsed do to fire in their history and then suddenly 3 happen all on the same day. And it really does seem like public awareness is being diverted away from building 7. Who knows, I wish they had a better investigation.

[dommyboysinjapan]

I am a proud member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice and I'd just like to say that I thought Ian was very civil and fair to all his guests and to his callers. I have studied this for about six years now and I have a good basic understanding of the politics behind the attack so I can certainly understand that he had a few "Why" questions. Unfortunately Gage had to refrain from talking about possible motives and suspects because it goes out of his scope of expertise. It was a good interview.

[Jaffsickle]

Rigged ending

[anewlow23]

@tagalder70 Also why doesn't Punnett tell the callers to turn down there radios once there were horrible echoes!!!??

[anewlow23]

@tagalder70 Also why doesn't Punnett tell the callers to turn down there radios once there were horrilbe echoes!!!??

[anewlow23]

@tagalder70 Also why doesn't Punnett tell the callers to turn down there phones once there were horrilbe echoes!!!??

[chrisjames1962]

It doesn't matter, we can debate this till the end of time. This will never be given even the most rudimentary investigation. The government has made sure of that by immediately disposing of the evidence. This hasn't even gotten the type of investigation that goes on for a minor crime that goes to court. Dismissed eyewitness accounts and contamination of evidence just like JFK's assassination, Oklahoma city bombing, Waco TX, TWA Flight 800. The government knows it can get away with anything.