NASA | HD Lunar Flyover of the First Images from the LRO Camera

Want more? Check out YouTube channel "Return2Moon09" for the most up to date flyovers from the LRO Camera!

Subscribe to NASA on iTunes!
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=283424434

Or get tweeted by NASA:
http://twitter.com/NASAGoddard

A starkly beautiful region a few kilometers east of Hell E crater, which is located on the floor of the ancient Imbrian-aged Deslandres impact structure in the lunar highlands south of Mare Nubium. Numerous small, secondary craters can be identified, including several small crater chains. Also identifiable are distinctive lineations made readily apparent by the extreme lighting, representing ejecta from a nearby impact. The NAC image shown here has not been calibrated and the pixel values were stretched to enhance contrast. The full image width is 3.5 kilometers making features discernable down to a few meters in size.

Download this video from:
http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/goto?10447

See original image info and caption at: http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc_browse/view/nacl000000fd

Credit: NASA/GSFC/ASU

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• NASA
• Goddard
• LRO
• Lunar
• Reconnaissance
• Orbiter
• Moon
• LROC
• Camera
• Arizona
• State
• University
• flyover
• crater

[javinge]

Google Bad Astronomy, website maintained by a Mr Phil Plait, should debunk every little doubt your feeble mind can muster.

[MonkeyKong21]

YOU JUST GOT MOONED

[thor25]

Lunar hoaxers remind me not to be so harsh of the 9/11 truthers, you guys really help remind us to not hate the 9/11 truthers so much since we still have you nutcases around.

[WeAreTheRobots]

@cadu1995

I visited your source. It's a joke.

Close up:sure the LEM looks weak. Even I agree on that. But without proper sampling of material and engineering discussion (it's engineering,not aesthetic design), the points have no merit.

-Adhesive tape:prove its adhesive tape and not something else (like marks to check for misalignments).

-Buzz pics:obvious different camera exposure settings.

-Shadows:from the first pic it's obvious the twin rocks are far away, so the alignment is only apparent.

[WeAreTheRobots]

@cadu1995

> THIS was SUPPOSED to be an up-close look at the apollo remnants.

And it was, *at the available resolution*. And you can see the modules and even the tracks leaved by the moon rover.

>IT FAILED.

*facepalm*

> And the long awaited Kaguya SHOWED NOTHING ALSO

Because the resolution of its cameras is at most 10 meters. Too large, so you *wouldn't* expect it to resolve the modules. A moronic tech un-savvy point for you.

>we never went to any moon

*You* didn't.

[WeAreTheRobots]

@cadu1995

> ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? That's the dumbest statement i have ever read

Not when you consider all the people who they should keep in silence, plus producing all the rest of the "evidence" so the mission could be tracked even by amateurs, and the TV signal received from Australia.

And the Galileo experiment in a vacuum. And the movement in lower gravity of astronauts and moon dust, that _cannot_ be replicated by simply changing the frame speed.

[WeAreTheRobots]

@cadu1995

>PROVE THE PICTURES WERN'T FAKED.

It doesn't work that way. You claim they are fake, you have the burden of proof.

The rest is a non-argument, since it results in a non-sequitur fallacy.

[cadu1995]

@WeAreTheRobots including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.

YOU MORONIC FUCKTARD-THE SOVIET UNION (YOU LIAR) WAS UNABLE TO TRACK ANY APOLLO MISSION ASSHOLE.

THEY COULDN'T EVEN TRACK THEIR OWN TO THE MOON SHITHEAD. THEY HAD TO ASK ENGLAND TO DO IT FOR THEM YOU FUCKTARD LOSER.

WE never went to any moon LIAR.

you are a fucking robot asswipe.and a parrot & a sheep boy loser.

take your cr & shove it bitchboy who can't put simple websites up

[WeAreTheRobots]

@cadu1995

> Talk about tech-savvy-you're a fucking moron loser.

And you didn't spot the OBVIOUS CR character, so at best we call it a moronic draw.

> YOU have no argument to begin with asswipe because LRO SHOWS NOTHING

You have dismissed the images with no actual argument. Typical of hoaxers.

And you still have to address the list of evidence from third parties around the world, including that of the Soviet Union, who DID track the Apollo missions, specially the first one.

[cadu1995]

@WeAreTheRobots aulis . com is a simple way to explain it to a simpleton-

just skip a space moron.

aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html

MORON

BTW THAT is supposed to be the LEM ON THE MOON-LOL All cardboard & duct tape. NASA PHOTOS GENIUS. lol loser