Pat Condell - The Crooked Judges of Amsterdam

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
338 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2010

Pat Condell rants about the heresy trial of Geert Wilders in Amsterdam, freedom of speech, and dhimmitude.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mr Condell got it Absolutely Right up to the point where he fell for the decades old Big Lie that there was every such a movement in America as "McCarthyism" and/or that the much maligned and vilified Senator McCarthy (during an era when there were more Soviet agents in the traitor, Roosevelt's" and Harry Truman's cabinets than there were then & are now at Oxbridge and/or in once-great Britain's foreign office) was ever other than the Geert Wilders of his time. Mr McCarthy was Geert on steroids!

  • Geert Wilders is on trial for telling the truth about Islam.

    It's outrageous that a member of Dutch parliament is forced to live like a fugitive, under 24-hours-a-day police protection and must move from place to place every night.

    Wilders living under constant death threats proves that radical Islam is incompatible with Western democracy.

    Btw, why aren't the Muslim 'demonstrators' on trial who scream "Alla-hu akbar" while giving the Heil Hitler salute and calling for the death of Jews?

  • @tarquinfarquhar - Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.

    --Barry Goldwater

  • If you want to follow an irrational belief system, and it helps you get through the day, then congratulations. But it has nothing to do with this video or the issue Mr. Condell raises.

    Mr Condells so-called "extremism" does not negate the validity of his rational remarks. However, your irrational response negates the validity of your belief system.

  • You do not have to have a "belief system" to wish to avoid killing someone. You admit that science can sometimes be wrong but then go on to say that you will live on average five years longer than someone without a belief system - according to science. Your reply is irrational.

    This video concerns the oppression of one who voices unpopular thoughts. It is about freedom of speech. It is about ugly truths.

  • The issue is not with extremism per se. but with religion and irrational thought. Pat's so-called extremism is warranted against the religious fanatics. Do you really think a mild response is going to be effective against zealotry?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more