@pesciro I can agree with that..really...but there are not solid pieces of evidence at Shanksville,only alleged engine and the alleged black boxes,but still they claim that F93 did hit the ground there,and I am not sure of that,actually I am pretty convinced that F93 landed somewhere or it has been destroyed in the air,no way it ended up in Shanksville,no way
@TheRobijas007 One of the ways to know is by retrieving the sink rate data from the CDR, and that's your best piece of evidence. Witness accounts are usually not very reliable. For instance, there are several ways to explain that witnesses couldn't hear the engines: 1. the airplane was in a supersonic dive 2. Witnesses were too shocked to pay attention to details that in a different situation wouldn't scape your perception. 3. It was all crap. It's best to have a convincing piece of evidence.
@pesciro Flight 93 impacted at 500mph (650mph was reported Oct 24th) according to early reports. I found those reports very curious... just how did they measure that? Interestingly, witnesses report the planes engines stopped and there was no sound just before the crash.Here we can see the debris,and this plane hit the ground at raging off control speed,so it should be at least equal if not bigger than F93
@pesciro i see,simple as that,flight 93 has so lame evidences,almost ridiculous...I can not imagine how someone can believe that what has been told by 9/11 commission suppose to be truth...how stupid you have to be to believe in that bunch of crap...
@smith077906 except the plane parts on the pentagon lawn :)
pete5668 9 hours ago
is this a charter plane?
SONIC29210 1 day ago
with the exception 0f 911, you see plane parts in plane crashes, ???????
smith077906 3 days ago
@pesciro I can agree with that..really...but there are not solid pieces of evidence at Shanksville,only alleged engine and the alleged black boxes,but still they claim that F93 did hit the ground there,and I am not sure of that,actually I am pretty convinced that F93 landed somewhere or it has been destroyed in the air,no way it ended up in Shanksville,no way
TheRobijas007 4 days ago
@TheRobijas007 One of the ways to know is by retrieving the sink rate data from the CDR, and that's your best piece of evidence. Witness accounts are usually not very reliable. For instance, there are several ways to explain that witnesses couldn't hear the engines: 1. the airplane was in a supersonic dive 2. Witnesses were too shocked to pay attention to details that in a different situation wouldn't scape your perception. 3. It was all crap. It's best to have a convincing piece of evidence.
pesciro 4 days ago
@pesciro Flight 93 impacted at 500mph (650mph was reported Oct 24th) according to early reports. I found those reports very curious... just how did they measure that? Interestingly, witnesses report the planes engines stopped and there was no sound just before the crash.Here we can see the debris,and this plane hit the ground at raging off control speed,so it should be at least equal if not bigger than F93
TheRobijas007 4 days ago
@TheRobijas007 No, I meant how do you know this airplane crashed faster than the 757? What happened in 9/11 has nothing to do with that question.
pesciro 4 days ago
@pesciro i see,simple as that,flight 93 has so lame evidences,almost ridiculous...I can not imagine how someone can believe that what has been told by 9/11 commission suppose to be truth...how stupid you have to be to believe in that bunch of crap...
TheRobijas007 4 days ago
@TheRobijas007 really? how do you know?
pesciro 4 days ago
20:21 OOOH DA40XLS :)
DiamondPilotDan 5 days ago