Rob Schremp shines @ LAK 12.05.08

Rob Schremp earns two points for himself, and gets denied on what probably should have been a shootout goal (seriously, the puck is over the line inside the glove, ok?), but earns himself the game's 1st star. Congrats, Rob! Keep it up!!

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• rob
• schremp
• edmonton
• oilers
• los
• angeles
• kings

[mugsy2009]

that was in! dont care what anyone says, i know it doesnt matter now but it was definitly in, way to go schremp!!! hopefully the oil can do somethin right this year and keep him up.

[bellephly]

it was definitely in. the last angle they show, you can see the edge of the puck and how it was laying and if there was no glove, 100% chance of a goal. such bullshit!

[timbo3744]

and why does shremp not play full time for the oil and penner does? Fire Mactavish!!!!!!

[MakaveliTheDon96]

wow, goal or not, that was an amazing fuckin save

[jdmimport13]

I think it was in too BUT if their is any doubt of the play they have to rule inconclusive. Obviously from one angle it appears it's over the line, the worst angle though. Overhead it's a different story. I think it was in but they couldn't prove it for sure to over rule it. NHL at it's finest.

[pruane2isgod]

@bellephly can you see the entire puck across the line? No, its in his glove. Is his entire glove in the net? No, part of it stays on the line. Can you therefore make a surefire call and say its in the net? No, you can never be sure. Is it the right call? Yes

[Maverrick11]

@bellephly but the rule is that if u cant say for sure that its a goal, its not a goal...cant complain because the rule goes against your team...

[razorslice17]

Good game for an underrated player, but the puck was definitely not 100% over the line

[SkittlesAM821]

nahh tht wasnt in

[regginnolemretaw]

Labarbara sucks ass, thank god for quick and bernier!!!

[Harkins1721]

@razorslice17 High sticking is making contact with another player OR hitting the puck out of the air above your shoulder with your stick.

[Harkins1721]

@bellephly The full puck has to cross the line in order to be a goal. I can understand why they say theres not enough evidence here because theres not. The angle shown isnt enough to give it a goal. It could be 100% in and with the right angle we could maybe see that but rules are rules.

[razorslice17]

Is it legal for Schremp to do his weird lacrosse dekes in the NHL? Or would it be high sticking?