Did he just say--wait, lemme reel it back and make sure...yep, he did. He just said that stupid people have more common sense than not-stupid people. I think we found a stupid people.
if something can not be in some way understood mathematicly or predicted in one way or another it does not exist, it is scary to face reality but it is beautiful, more beautiful than made up stories in the bible for a example.
You are missing the point entirely... Choices are *made up* of binary yes/no inputs, not the macro events themselves. Did you even read the ctmu? Or just watch some interview.
@TransfiguredinChrist While the CTMU does describe, at least in principle, our minds as a subset of the mind of God, it doesn't describe our actions as that of Gods.
Furthermore, I see this as no different than the argument: "If God created everything, then, by proxy, he created evil. Therefore, God did not create everything, and if he didn't create everything, then there exists elements of reality which were not created by God. This implies that God is not an otological necessity. "
@TransfiguredinChrist I certainly agree that God is real, i.e., part of reality, and that He is in fact the cohesive principle binding reality firmly in place. I also agree that the scope of our vision is not nearly complete. I simply disagree in your claim that we can now *nothing* about God. My logical reasoning in other posts contradicts this claim quite blatantly.
@TransfiguredinChrist In fact, the argument can be just as easily applied to an apple, your example, and one would arrive at the conclusion that apples are inseparable from logic, which is true as apples are (like everything) a part of God.
with the way you use the word spiritual it is interchangeable with consciousness. You are consciousness matter.
FaceTheFaqs 6 days ago
Did he just say--wait, lemme reel it back and make sure...yep, he did. He just said that stupid people have more common sense than not-stupid people. I think we found a stupid people.
TomVodkaCollins 3 weeks ago
you are a good man
ThePaul1E 1 month ago
if something can not be in some way understood mathematicly or predicted in one way or another it does not exist, it is scary to face reality but it is beautiful, more beautiful than made up stories in the bible for a example.
ThePaul1E 1 month ago
it is not common sense to make trivial knowledge spread by human beings through for an example the bible sound like universal facts.
ThePaul1E 1 month ago
You are missing the point entirely... Choices are *made up* of binary yes/no inputs, not the macro events themselves. Did you even read the ctmu? Or just watch some interview.
Caladcholg 1 month ago
@The99Metric And, if he is not an otological necessity, why say he exists at all?
The99Metric 2 months ago
@TransfiguredinChrist While the CTMU does describe, at least in principle, our minds as a subset of the mind of God, it doesn't describe our actions as that of Gods.
Furthermore, I see this as no different than the argument: "If God created everything, then, by proxy, he created evil. Therefore, God did not create everything, and if he didn't create everything, then there exists elements of reality which were not created by God. This implies that God is not an otological necessity. "
The99Metric 2 months ago
@TransfiguredinChrist I certainly agree that God is real, i.e., part of reality, and that He is in fact the cohesive principle binding reality firmly in place. I also agree that the scope of our vision is not nearly complete. I simply disagree in your claim that we can now *nothing* about God. My logical reasoning in other posts contradicts this claim quite blatantly.
ctmudebater 2 months ago
@TransfiguredinChrist In fact, the argument can be just as easily applied to an apple, your example, and one would arrive at the conclusion that apples are inseparable from logic, which is true as apples are (like everything) a part of God.
ctmudebater 2 months ago