Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Abortion Debate: 1 of 7 - Alan's Opening Argument

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,229
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 22, 2010

"Should Abortion Be Illegal?" debate at California State University San Marcos on April 20, 2010. Alan Shlemon and Professor Cecili Chadwick.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This is one of the best presentations of the Pro Life view I have seen. Very well structured, holistic arguments. Great job.

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TherionNLD try googling - granthamcollection

    

  • @tbeld Yeah, I've heard of the parasite argument and I think it's a silly argument, perhaps it has some merit in cases of rape though. I've also heard pro-lifers compare legal abortion to the holocaust which to me shows how strange a consistent pro-life position is.

  • @TherionNLD I don't know exactly how you define conscious, but infants aren't really self-aware the first few months after birth.

  • @TherionNLD If you had two 30 year old twins in comas where one was born that way and the other recently became that way, despite the fact they are indistinguishable only one would be a person? It seems strange to define something by what it was instead of what it is.

  • @TherionNLD In the past it was incorrectly argued that blacks were human but not 100% equal to white people. That black people didn't pass the "looks like a person" test.

  • @TherionNLD I would choose number 2 because i would save an active 2 year old over a frozen 2 year old. If the choice was one adult in a coma and one alert child, i would save the alert child.

    Also, the embryos have a low survivability. People would be less likely to save a terminally ill child but that doesn't mean that the terminally ill are less of a person.

    I have herd it argued that a fetus is a parasite. What about?

    1. Pregnant woman

    2. Woman with tubeworm

  • @TherionNLD you are also assuming when consciousness start

  • @TherionNLD okay if the mother is going to die than okay kill the fetus but if not then the scenario is no the same

  • @TherionNLD so your point is that its ok to kill an innocent human but not an innocent person. still sounds like semantics to me but whatever, im done.

  • @me25422 You don't think a baby is conscious? I know babies don't remember being a baby but they're certainly conscious, they cry! Read my definition of being a person again: "A living human being that has been conscious, self-aware." I put the words "has been" in there otherwise you could argue that going to sleep or fainting meant you stop a person, which would be ridiculous of course.

    So the way I see it is: Personhood starts when consciousness starts, and it ends when you die.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more