Einstein Was Wrong - Falsifying Observational Evidence Presented 1 of 4

playlist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y09KQxcSjc&feature=PlayList&p=6078BE0...

Papers here: http://fascistsoup.com/2010/04/11/einstein-was-wrong/

I discuss a wide range of evidence that refutes Einstein's theories of warping space.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Einstein
• Relativity
• Hilbert
• Schwarzschild
• blackholes
• black
• hole
• ligo
• lisa
• wmap
• quasars
• pulsars
• neutron
• stars
• lcdm
• dark
• matter
• energy

[eyallev]

where should I begin?

well, how about LIGO, because that's the easiest. it did, and does work.

you have two options, when it comes to gravity. either it's immidiate. or progresses on a wave front.

evidance have showen that gravity is not immidiate, there for it's a wave.

[suedeslounge]

@eyallev ORLY?

The LIGO has never detected a gravitational wave. LIGO (on the fourth science run [S4]) and GEO600 together did not detect any gravitational waves. To date, LIGO’s fifth science run [S5], which had all three interferometers running continuously in triple-coincidence for an entire year, has not yielded any gravitational wave candidates.These non-detections directly refute previous theory and stand in direct contradiction to predictions made by the theory of general relativity.

[eyallev]

@suedeslounge I don't know, from reading thier site, one might think they have had a rather good run.

(triple w)(dot)ligo(dot)caltech(dot)ed­u(slash)~ll_news(slash)s5_news­(slash)s5article(dot)htm

[suedeslounge]

@eyallev read that article again only look closer this time. They never say they found gravitational waves, they simply say the S5 run was a "success". They then define "success" as not finding a damn thing. To them, they were "successful" simply because their instruments didn't choke.

[suedeslounge]

@garethb1961

I don't see any evidence of gravitational waves in any experiment ever conducted.

They don't exist.

They don't exist because space does not bend. Space is nothing. Space is an empty void in which matter occupies. Claiming that space bends and produces waves of gravity is an extraordinary claim.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

[suedeslounge]

@BlueCosmology GPS clocks are calculated without relying on Einsteinian relativity. Google " GPS AND RELATIVITY: AN ENGINEERING OVERVIEW" to see a paper by the USNO.

For more information on why GPS clocks prove nothing, Google "What the Global Positioning System Tells Us About Relativity"

[olga2415]

@suedeslounge Oh that reasoning: the cat's not in the room because the light was off and you could not see it! Dark matter has been proven to exist in particles so tiny they are referred to as nano particles. There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum or perfect nothingness.Many physicists get famous discussing dark matter. Now it doesn't exist? Say that after researching nanoparticles. And who knows what other even tinier particles or waves will be "seen" or perceived to be, in 50 years?

[grojoelp]

You say, "All the evidence shows that dark matter doesn't exist". Your conclusion about dark matter, gravitational dragging, etc. not existing is because there is no evidence it exists? Regardless of the evidence, that statement alone goes against the principles of scientific thought. I conclude you are not much of a scientist because you lack in scientific thought.

[chadisbad6]

...you have proven nothing its faulty machines that r comeing up with the wrong data, the waves produced by black wholes bend everything including light so when it hits something the change from when that wave is bending will be instantanias and un readable by light because it will be bent and and unreadable buy any machine because the waves travel at the speed of light.

[lazychimp123]

@immichaeltaylor You do realize Einstein himself believed that his own theories were fundamentally wrong because they did not amount in a unified theory. This guy is just arguing with the fact that they are taught as just that...fact.

[ImMichaelTaylor]

@suedeslounge I mean, I get it on one level; the smarter people think the person you critique is, the smarter they will think you are. But what you haven't considered (or choose to ignore) is that people familiar with the actual debate among real scientists will immediately spot that these internet rumours ostensibly aspiring to the same aim are partly crude pantomimes of the reality, and partly dramatic fiction.