Is this the theory of everything?

...so a neutron is like a canceling wave with 3 quarks, well, that explains alot to me, I wish I had some way of explaining it but I doubt it would make sense, or that anyone would listen. k, still wanting an electron microscope...

A neutron is not an elementary particle, FYI. It's composed of one up quark (which has a charge of +2/3), and 2 down quarks (which each have a charge equal to -1/3), which summed up form an electric charge equal to 0.

You have failed, not science (so far, anyway).

Wow really good replys !!!! You have made a very good point.

Not to say that most of these people are intelligent but there is no reasoning with people like Steven Hawkings or David Deutsch, They honestly view themselves as smarter than anyone else and this leads to ignorance as a single person cant think they can hold all the keys and expect doors to be unlocked. when a theory is questioned 99% of the time it is answered by more theory. that isnt science, its called faith based religion.

The problem here is that science has developed into a religion and the people of stanford, MIT, cambridge think that if it comes out of there mouth its gospel. This of course isnt the case. for far to long we have gotten away from fact and filled in the voids with theory, then try to pass off theory as fact. take the preposterous string theory for instance. this has given birth to a plethora of ideas that are not only unprovable but some down right goes against what we do know as fact.

it was proven that there was something like a .0001 (im sure that number is wrong but it was a slim chance) chance that his car would fly off the planet and hit the moon. The panel argued back that a .0001 ment it wasnt gonna happen however he continued to argue that a .0001 chance was a chance and after this went back and forth for like half an hour one guy on the panel said "well, it all depends how long you wait" Terrence laughed, said no i can wait forever it never gonna happen n walked out.

as much as I believe that electrical charge plays the leading role in gravity one things i have been against for so long is the use of mathematical models to "Prove" theory. I can make a model that says a monkey will fly from my butt however this isnt gonna happen. I think it was Terrence Witt who argued this as well (could be wrong n maybe it was terrence talking about someone else) but the argument was that according to a stanford accepted model .......

ow my brain is bleeding

WOAT?

Shit... I'd like so much to understand complex physics concepts like this...

I didnt understand the significance of the patterns. There is surely a relation between the forces but we need it inthe form of constants and variables in an equation. I would understand it more in terms of an equation instead