Has global warming stopped in spite of CO2? NEW - NEW - English subtitles. Press captions = CC in the right lower corner of the YouTube screen to get English subtitles.
@Halofanbiggest It is not viewed as scientifically correct as it isnt - it is pseudoscience. Form a solar physics point of view (the Sun's magnetic field has not stengtened the cornerstone of his argument); the CR flux has not chnaged; the cosmic rays that do make it to Earth are absorbed too high in the atmosphere; as nucleation centers they suck; and there has been no change in cloud cover. The final nail is Chernobyl - it released 1000s of time more perticles than CRs - no clouds resulted.
@Halofanbiggest Sorry, no scientist but Svenmark thinks that. The experiment (I assume you mean the CERN one) if you read the associated paper it says that the mechanism works (as we all knew if you played with a cloud chamber in college) but that it was 100 time less efficient than it needed to be to have a measureable effect on climate. Than in science terms is a FAIL!
@drkstrong Unfortunatley though this theory was not scientifically viewed upon with the right perspective as it is supposedly "politically incorrect" to speak out against global warming these days.
@drkstrong They have in fact changed. And his pattern is spot on as it is not a theory any more it is proven with experimental and empirical evidence. Thus a proven theory making it a law of climate. This is how every single other climate discovery was made ever on this earth.
Well to be honest all heat on this planet gets is from the sun you dick, we have a CLIMATE that protects us from it do a video on how we will burn up tosser.
@Halofanbiggest It is not viewed as scientifically correct as it isnt - it is pseudoscience. Form a solar physics point of view (the Sun's magnetic field has not stengtened the cornerstone of his argument); the CR flux has not chnaged; the cosmic rays that do make it to Earth are absorbed too high in the atmosphere; as nucleation centers they suck; and there has been no change in cloud cover. The final nail is Chernobyl - it released 1000s of time more perticles than CRs - no clouds resulted.
drkstrong 1 month ago
@Halofanbiggest Sorry, no scientist but Svenmark thinks that. The experiment (I assume you mean the CERN one) if you read the associated paper it says that the mechanism works (as we all knew if you played with a cloud chamber in college) but that it was 100 time less efficient than it needed to be to have a measureable effect on climate. Than in science terms is a FAIL!
drkstrong 1 month ago
@drkstrong Unfortunatley though this theory was not scientifically viewed upon with the right perspective as it is supposedly "politically incorrect" to speak out against global warming these days.
Halofanbiggest 1 month ago
@drkstrong They have in fact changed. And his pattern is spot on as it is not a theory any more it is proven with experimental and empirical evidence. Thus a proven theory making it a law of climate. This is how every single other climate discovery was made ever on this earth.
Halofanbiggest 1 month ago
Man sped up the timing of global warming.
ruflychux 11 months ago
Problem with Svensmark's theory is that we measure the number of cosmic rays hitting the earth and th epattern has not changed.
drkstrong 1 year ago
Very good video and I only wish that more people would see the science and not the propaganda of Global warming C02 taxation
Warhead3000 1 year ago
Good vid... and one atractive nariator.
darrellmellissa 1 year ago
Well to be honest all heat on this planet gets is from the sun you dick, we have a CLIMATE that protects us from it do a video on how we will burn up tosser.
1livepl 1 year ago