Baghdad Building Destruction
Loading...
28,046
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (11)
-
Just wondering, why didn't they use an implosion instead of just toppling it? Seems like they could have saved time and money by having a larger, but smaller pile of debree.
The only reasons why I can think they didn't do it was
A: Just something to do(morale, ect)
B: It was unsafe to plant explosions in the upper part of the building, which is likely the reason.
-
like rosie odonaled falling off the view. pow
-
dude, its concrete
-
jihad!
-
Can't fire take down a building?? Why didn't they just light a fire in it?
-
lmao good for them man =]
-
YEA BOI
-
The workers are cheering...please liberals stfu
Loading...
i love when huge things fall over. they make great sounds.
mindisarazorblade 4 years ago 5
Dude LOL
economistBR 4 years ago 3