Non Biblical evidence as proof for Jesus Christ (3 of 4)

This video references the following website:
http://www.thedevineevidence.com/jesu...

This video is a presentation of the evidence for the existence of Jesus.
It uses only non- biblical sources and goes through the skeptical arguments for each claim.

It will be surprising for some to see how much evidence for the historicity of Jesus there actually is, in fact there is more evidence for Jesus' existence, as you will see, than there is for most of the prominent figures in ancient history.

*Warning*
Watching this video will take away your ability to claim honestly that Jesus was a myth

From (as in, not from UNFFwildcard)
Chris White
http://nowheretorun.podomatic.com
chris@conspiracyclothes.com
Category: Education

Tags: Christianity Jesus existence real fake myth proof evidence

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Religion
• religious
• Bible
• books
• Scripture
• Old Testament
• New testament
• Scribes
• God
• Jesus
• Holy Spirit
• Christ
• Christian
• accuracy
• reliability
• Muslim
• Islam
• Quran
• Mohammed
• Jewish
• Judaism
• Israel
• Hebrew
• New age
• Science
• evolution
• Nazareth
• proof
• biblical

[SolaFide729]

Great video series. As a student of history, I must say it is nice to see someone depict the events in an accurate matter, instead of manipulating them to try to prove a falsehood. It is also interesting to note that if we apply the same standards that atheists use to attempt to discredit Jesus, to other historical figures, we wouldn't be able to prove anyone before the 17th century existed.

[BibleAccuracyChannel]

@franks2732 No one can know everything. You are not objective. Your comments are biased. You will remain unable to learn, cause you choose to believe what you want to and not what is the truth.

Your deceptive and unfounded quote shows your attitude towards Christianity is negative, you would not except it through science or debate. Hope you find your way in the end. All the best:-)

[CapQuacer]

at this point we are past the people who lived durring the time, at most we might say that a person exisited who was claimed to be devine.

[TheFedupcitizen]

@jethuffman He cannot acknowledge his existence, he never witnessed the living Jesus. He can only comment on what the Christians believe.

[thebestusernameeva]

@faithislife86 I already have seen that. I cannot be convinced to follow any religion, nor do I support theology. I stand grounded until tangible evidence is brought to the table. Nevertheless, I am always to whatever my opposition has to say, as any good skeptic should.

[faithislife86]

@thebestusernameeva look up billy crone the final countdown then say you will not be convinced.

[jethuffman]

I believe the point here is that even those early historians who seek to discredit Jesus as the Christ still acknowledge his actual existence.

[TheFedupcitizen]

So you accept Celsus's writing about the alleged Jesus, but do not accept the Pandera father story? So you are running in circles to prove your side?

[thebestusernameeva]

I'm a solid atheist with strong opinions and a free mind... And I'm actually enjoying this series thus far :) I still won't be convinced in the existence of a god, but it's great to see how this particular guy uses actual logic and reason in his explanations. You're a rationalist first, and I respect that!

[HandiCripple666]

"If he was discussing a mythical character, he would not have had to go to such lengths, but to have merely dismissed Jesus as a myth. After all, there is no easier way to discredit a religion than to assert its founder never existed." Rrrriiiight…now THAT is a sound argument.

[HandiCripple666]

The bitch about it is that I'm writing a paper questioning the historicity of Jesus, and being a good skeptic I'm trying to find a strong argument FOR his existence, not against. The only reason the idea even came to me is bc we all just assume the biblical description of Jesus is 100% fact, failing to realize that the one source most accept is, well, alotta bit biased. Lemme tall ya, in my autobiography I'm about 2 inches taller, 3 inches longer, 40 lbs. lighter, & 50 times cooler LOL

[HandiCripple666]

When I talk with my kid about Santa Claus or his supernatural powers, I'm not proving his existence by making statements by stating that I don't think his reindeer can fly. For that matter, assuming his existence for the sake of a theoretical conversation doesn't even prove my belief regarding his existence or his capabilities. I'm sure there's some official "––– fallacy" name for this argument, but in lieu of that, I'll simply call it a paper thin argument.