Why do people laugh at creationists ? Part 27 (Made by ThunderF00t)

Part of a series of videos exposing the funny stupidity of creationists and why they deserve to be laughed at. In each case the creationist statements are shown to be outrageously stupid by even the most rudimentary knowledge of science.

Here the obscene hypocrisy of Venomfangx (aka posterboy for creationist stupidity (PCS)) is highlighted.
Stating how 'limited' he thinks scientific naturalism is while enjoying the standard near heavenly standard of life that scientific naturalism allows.
This looks particularly obscene when it is contrasted with his theological beliefs that 'amputees dont deserve their arms, we deserve to die'.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• VenomFangX
• Proof
• Proving
• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• Lord
• Heaven
• Hell
• Evidence
• Creation
• Evolution
• Science
• Discovery
• BBC
• Nature
• Life
• DNA
• Molecule
• Atom
• Gene
• Theology
• Atheism
• creationism
• Dawkins
• Religion
• kirk
• Cameron
• amazing
• hypocrisy
• thunderf00t
• ungrateful
• mansion
• naturalism
• godless

[ShadowNinjask]

i would like to see thunderfoot vs Venomfang face2face on live tv, would be great

[OkamsRazer]

@OkamsRazer I just realized in re-reading that post I made that the grammar was vague in one of my statements.

"I suppose none of you who are unfamiliar with Venomfang should be surprised by Thunderfoot getting you up to speed on the fact he is a spoiled little rich boy with nothing betetr to do than try to cast stones at his intellectual superiors to give his life purpose."

Just to alleviate any misreading, I was referencing VFX as the aforementioned spoiled little rich boy not Thunder.

[OkamsRazer]

I suppose none of you who are unfamiliar with Venomfang should be surprised by Thunderfoot getting you up to speed on the fact he is a spoiled little rich boy with nothing betetr to do than try to cast stones at his intellectual superiors to give his life purpose. From watching VFX for years in his own videos and those of his detractors (until he took off into the internet ether thankfully) I was surprised more didnt catch on.

[OkamsRazer]

@Seekfacts1 naaah. He would be the kid sitting next to Dawkins, eating the sand.

[OkamsRazer]

It unfortunate that only our 5 senses are what we have for determining anything, so unless people of this ilk suggest we have ESP or something, but wait psychics and "magicians" are supposed to be catering to demons....oops.

[Seekfacts1]

If Dawkins is a kid observing the properties of how sand falls in a sand box, Than Venom Fang X is a baby shiting his diaper!

[Zeroethorder]

LOL 420 vies

[seretkeena]

@veraberry You are incorrect, sir. It is -widely- accepted that the bible is not a literal translation, because some Hebrew words do not translate exactly to English. The bible was not written in English. The bible was written in Hebrew. As a result, many, many words were translated through the years 'as close as possible' or 'close enough' or in such a way to translate the bible to fit the interpretation of whomever was translating it. God requires righteousness, but man is not infallible.

[veraberry]

@seretkeena Wrong. There is no problem with the translation. It says this over and over again. God requires righteousness that He is more than willing to impart to us by grace through faith. He gives us His divine nature to be free from sin. See Romans 6.

[seretkeena]

@veraberry Cor 6:9-10 has been discussed referring to the translations themselves, details this very thing and that it's not actually homosexuality itself that is a sin, but rather prostitution, referring instead to male prostitutes who service male clients. Enter Corinthians 6:9 into Google and the first link should pop up detailing the translations. Youtube won't accept URL's in comments for some reason or I'd post it directly.