William Lane Craig's Reaction to Richard Dawkins' Refusal to Debate Him
Uploader Comments (drcraigvideos)
Top Comments
-
@Arcanage "God made it and God is great. No evidence needed. How do you debate that?" Ask Dawkins. He debated Lennox and McGrath. But assume the opposite, genius: "blind and dead nature did it and made it without design. No evidence needed. How do you debate with that? If Dawkins isn't an atheist apologist then why does he keep defending atheism? Honestly, you're not making any sense by defending Dawkins at all.
-
@Arcanage Well, look at the conversation so far, slick. You haven't replied to anything I said anyway, except to dodge over and over again. There's plenty of evidence for God. Just because your already-made-up mind isn't convinced by it that doesn't mean there isn't actual good evidence for God. Anyway, goodbye.
All Comments (212)
-
@drcraigvideos I was thinking the same thing. Weird how all these atheists are more fanatical than the crusaders.
The bible did speak about this in Revelations though.
-
@Frab2001 "it would look good on his record and not mine" i defend dawkins on this, losing a debate would look bad on dawkins resume and good on craigs
-
@vas13xtq He is a scientist, then, why he writes about philosophy? Writing about the nonexistence of God is sheer philosophy and the debate about the existence of God is simply a philosophical debate. Then he has proved that his knowledge of philosophy is quite weak, refusing to debate Craig.
-
Did you know the highest ranked academic degree in United Kingdom is "Doctor of divinity"?
It's the study of Christian theology . Seriously WTF?
But also I can think of it this way. Divinity is so difficult that it takes the best few Bullshuiter on earth to get a degree for it.
-
@whatexploded ROFL.
-
"Never debate an idiot. He will drag you down to his level, then win on experience"-Woody Allen, as best I can remember.
Dawkins wont debate Craig because he is a scientist and Craig wont supply any demonstrable evidence for his deity. His deity doesnt have to be put in a test tube to be demonstrated. Craig just shouts out easily debatable arguments hence why the debate still goes on today.
vas13xtq 5 months ago 5
@vas13xtq Craig actually gives evidence for God. All you have to do is try unplugging your ears when he gives the evidence and you'll hear it. That actually helps.
drcraigvideos 5 months ago
@drcraigvideos An argument is not evidence.
hummingbird830 6 days ago
@hummingbird830 Uh, okay, so if I argue 2 is the product of 1+1, then that isn't argument or evidence. You're incredibly bright.
drcraigvideos 6 days ago
@drcraigvideos No dear. That can be logically proven and can be backed by supporting evidence. Craig brings theorys of "God could be interventionist so he definitely is". This is an argument with no evidence.
hummingbird830 5 days ago
@hummingbird830 LOL! Look, you've just conceded that an argument can be evidence, yet when it comes to Dr. Craig giving an argument, well... Anyway, please, try to be fair. Pretending to be fair doesn't work with you.
drcraigvideos 5 days ago