3000 GT vs. Eclipse
Top Comments
All Comments (76)
-
what brand of bread did you use to record this?
-
@Yamamxs-- so true lol, that is atleast 5-7" gap hahah, fuck it since it's only a gt and has ricey wheels, might aswell fill that gap and put 22'z!!! "sarcasm"
-
lol wasent even a Vr4 for the vr4 wing is much thicker
-
@jacob50566 The respectable eclipses come in AWD. And a few have been built to 6 and 7 second cars, so you need to "do reaserch before you talk shit"....
-
Two piece of junk FWD cars.
-
If it's raining out you can take cover in that base model GT's wheel gap. :)
-
......was that a red light?
-
@jacob50566 Street "legal" or not, that car made 6.97 1/4 pass on a 2.0l 4G63 @ 1400 HP....dude 350hp per cylinder on a 2.0l...stock bore and stroke. A VR-4 even @ 1200hp doesn't stand a chance in hell. That top heavy AWD setup would get demolished by Brent Rau's RWD eclipse. Just to put the icing on the cake. Any car with a cat delete is no longer street legal...that's practically 95% of turbocharged tuner cars.
-
@jacob50566 Dude thats not a street leagle car, thats almost an nhra car, I know for a fact that the vr4 with 1200 hp can take it because the person that made the eclipse made it a rwd car
If that 3000gt was a Vr4, the eclipse would have looked like it was parked. Just considering that it got beat that bad by a SL.
SincerelyJnC 1 year ago 8
@washablemarker789 hope you know eclipses are slower than most cars, dont think its fast cuz of fast and the furious cuz it loses about 80% of races
gundamfuker 2 months ago