Creationism VS Evolution Debate @ Christ Church in Yukon, OK Part 8

Abbie Smith VS Dr. Charles Jackson on the topic: Does Molecular Genetics Support Human Evolution? @ Christ Church in Yukon, OK

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• abbie smith
• charles jackson
• evolution
• creationism
• debate
• yukon oklahoma
• molecular genetics

[RJL738]

There is intepretation but I hope he is not saying that we should have some intetional biase. Evidence does matter and he should not act like the only difference between the two theories is interpretation. I love how she breaks into stories but one option is to print 3 dimentional organs. A person can learn so much more from these debates. Science has so much potential in so many weird areas.

[RJL738]

Creationism is not an artbitrary injections of saying God did it because we don't know exactly what happened. It's important to realise that creationists don't want to believe what they believe for the sake of it, why would you otherwise so thoroughly defende an idea that is hard to accept in today's world. However true or not true this is not something just made up above all else people need to remember this.

[RJL738]

Actually even though evolutionists in a sesne say that common ancestry actually means that all the decendants are in some way the same creature they don't say directly that worms turned into eagles. I'm not even sure the lamen designations of ancesters in this theory are corrent but in any case this is more how it would have happened. It is annoying how he acts like this is a casual theory and not a well thought out explaination true or not.

[david84two]

if i told you that Bill Gates got all of the information for his software by random chance , that there was no intelligent design to any of his software you would call me a lier . But you are willing to except that the most complex coed ever developed came about by random chance , a error detecting self replicating code like DNA was just random chance ? where did the original information come from ?

[Futureplanet]

how can you explain evolution to morons in 1 hour?

Answer: You can't

Especially if they are determined to not listen, and assume it's some scientific conspiracy.

The lunacy is infuriating.

[pumpstations]

@LukeNewb Well you caught me. Good job!

Now, in the interest of saving space or just shear forgetfulness, I did leave out the most important part. PROOF. IT is so obvious to be needed with a reply, I may have just overlooked in a quick comment. You can start by proving Jesus actually existed, To even be seen. Upon receiving your noble prize and who knows what other honors, I will grant you the Matt - John thing. It should be easier to find proof of one god/man than four regulars

[LukeNewb]

@pumpstations The 4 gospels, Matt-John are all first hand accounts.

[RyuHadokenMaster]

This creationist is deliberately attempting to deceive the audience with misconceptions of evolution "worms turn into bald eagles", "monkey people", "every evolutionist believes in spontaneous generation" he is inches away from out-right lying!

[RyuHadokenMaster]

This creationist is deliberately attempting to deceive the audience with misconceptions of evolution "worms turn into bald eagles", "monkey people", he is not being honest here.

[pumpstations]

Worms turn into bald eagles? Does this man have shite for brains? Proof may not be evidence but lack of even evidence what is that? Can anyone name someone that wrote in the bible that even saw Jesus with his own eye? Now that is lack of even evidence. Yes, lets trust him with no good reason. I can think of some other times in history we trusted our religious leaders. Let's visit the good old days. Wow, he cant even see it. "The filter is strong with this one" - Yoda