They want to take away our freedom and make us pay for things that are free ( myspace, youtube and so on) do you want that?
http://www.savetheinternet.com
Senator DC Phone Stance
Akaka, Dan...
They want to take away our freedom and make us pay for things that are free ( myspace, youtube and so on) do you want that? http://www.savetheinternet.com Senator DC Phone Stance Akaka, Daniel K. (D-HI) 202-224-6361 For Alexander, Lamar (R-TN) 202-224-4944 Unknown Allard, Wayne (R-CO) 202-224-5941 Unknown Allen, George (R-VA) 202-224-4024 Against Baucus, Max (D-MT) 202-224-2651 Unknown Bayh, Evan (D-IN) 202-224-5623 For Bennett, Robert F.(R-UT 202-224-5444 Unknown Biden, Joseph R. (D-DE) 202-224-5042 For Bingaman, Jeff (D-NM) 202-224-5521 Unknown Bond, Chris S. (R-MO) 202-224-5721 Unknown Boxer, Barbara (D-CA) 202-224-3553 For Brownback, Sam (R-KS) 202-224-6521 Against Bunning, Jim (R-KY) 202-224-4343 Unknown Burns, Conrad R. (R-MT) 202-224-2644 Against Burr, Richard (R-NC) 202 224-3154 Unknown Byrd, Robert C. (D-WV) 202-224-3954 Unknown Cantwell, Maria (D-WA) 202-224-3441 For Carper, Thomas (D-DE) 202-224-2441 Unknown Chafee, Lincoln D.(R-RI)202-224-2921 Unknown Chambliss, Saxby (R-GA) 202-224-3521 Unknown Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) 202-224-4451 For Coburn, Tom (R-OK) 202 224-5754 Unknown Cochran, Thad (R-MS) 202-224-5054 Unknown Coleman, Norm (R-MN) 202-224-5641 Unknown Collins, Susan (R-ME) 202-224-2523 Unknown Conrad, Kent (D-ND) 202-224-2043 Unknown Cornyn, John (R-TX) 202-224-2934 Unknown Craig, Larry E. (R-ID) 202-224-2752 Against Crapo, Mike (R-ID) 202-224-6142 Unknown Dayton, Mark (D-MN) 202-224-3244 Waffling DeMint, Jim (R-SC) 202 224-6121 Against DeWine, Mike (R-OH) 202-224-2315 Unknown Dodd, Chris (D-CT) 202-224-2823 For Dole, Elizabeth (R-NC) 202-224-6342 Unknown Domenici,Pete V. (R-NM) 202-224-6621 Unknown Dorgan, Byron L. (D-ND) 202-224-2551 For Durbin,Richard J. (D-IL)202-224-2152 Unknown Ensign, John (R-NV) 202-224-6244 Against Enzi, Michael (R-WY) 202-224-3424 Unknown Feingold,Russell D.(D-WI)202-224-5323 For Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)202-224-3841 For Frist, William H. (R-TN)202-224-3344 Unknown Graham, Lindsey (R-SC) 202-224-5972 Unknown Grassley, Charles E.(R-IA)202-224-3744 Unknown Gregg, Judd (R-NH) 202-224-3324 Unknown Hagel, Chuck (R-NE) 202-224-4224 Unknown Harkin, Tom (D-IA) 202-224-3254 Unknown Hatch, Orrin G. (R-UT) 202-224-5251 Unknown Hutchison, Kay Bailey (R-TX)202-224-5922Against Inhofe, James M. (R-OK) 202-224-4721 Unknown Inouye, Daniel K. (D-HI)202-224-3934 For Isakson, Johnny (R-GA) 202 224-3643 Unknown Jeffords, James M. (I-VT)202-224-5141 Unknown Johnson, Tim (D-SD) 202-224-5842 Unknown Kennedy, Edward M. (D-MA)202-224-4543 Unknown Kerry, John F. (D-MA) 202-224-2742 For Kohl, Herb (D-WI) 202-224-5653 Unknown Kyl, Jon (R-AZ) 202-224-4521 Unknown Landrieu, Mary (D-LA) 202-224-5824 Unknown Lautenberg, Frank (D-NJ)202-224-3224 For Leahy, Patrick J. (D-VT)202-224-4242 For Levin, Carl (D-MI) 202-224-6221 Unknown Lieberman, Joesph I. (D-CT)202-224-4041 Waffling Lincoln, Lambert(D-AR) 202-224-4843 Unknown Lott, Trent (R-MS) 202-224-6253 Against Lugar, Richard G. (R-IN)202-224-4814 Unknown Martinez, Mel (R-FL) 202 224-3041 Unknown McCain, John (R-AZ) 202-224-2235 Against McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) 202-224-2541 Unknown Menendez, Robert (D-NJ) 202-224-4744 Unknown Mikulski, Barbara A. (D-MD)202-224-4654 Waffling Murkowski, Lisa (R-AK) 202-224-6665 Unknown Murray, Patty (D-WA) 202-224-2621 Unknown Nelson, Bill (D-FL) 202-224-5274 For Nelson, Ben (D-NE) 202-224-6551 For Obama, Barack (D-IL) 202 224-2854 For Pryor, Mark (D-AR) 202-224-2353 For Reed, Jack (D-RI) 202-224-4642 Unknown Reid, Harry (D-NV) 202-224-3542 For Roberts, Pat (R-KS) 202-224-4774 Unknown Rockefeller,John D.(D-WV)202-224-6472 For Salazar, Ken (D-CO) 202 224-5852 Unknown Santorum, Rick (R-PA) 202-224-6324 Unknown Sarbanes, Paul S. (D-MD)202-224-4524 Unknown Schumer, Charles (D-NY) 202-224-6542 Unknown Sessions, Jeff (R-AL) 202-224-4124 Unknown Shelby, Richard C. (R-AL)202-224-5744 Unknown Smith, Gordon (R-OR) 202-224-3753 Against Snowe, Olympia (R-ME) 202-224-5344 For Specter, Arlen (R-PA) 202-224-4254 Waffling Stabenow, Debbie A. (D-MI)202-224-4822 Unknown Stevens, Ted (R-AK) 202-224-3004 Against Sununu, John (R-NH) 202-224-2841 Against Talent, Jim (R-MO) 202-224-6154 Unknown Thomas, Craig (R-WY) 202-224-6441 Against Thune, John (R-SD) 202 224-2321 Unknown Vitter, David (R-LA) 202 224-4623 Against Voinovich, George (R-OH)202-224-3353 Unknown Warner, John W. (R-VA) 202-224-2023 Unknown Wyden, Ron (D-OR) 202-224-5244 For
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Yeah, Net Neutrality is a load of crap! The reason the internet is great is because the government has kept it's fascist hands out of the picture. If you allow our government to start regulating the internet your online free speech, online privacy, and online dirty habits will be next.
Can anyone post a shred of evidence proving that internet service providers are deliberately favoring one site over another???
The evidence that some Internet Service Providers are eager to start favoring one website over another (speeding up download of one, slowing down download speed of another) is that they oppose net neutrality!
If they're not going to monkey with the packets, then why would they mind writing a net neutrality commitment into law?
Right?
It's like passing a law against carjacking. What kind of people would oppose that law? People intent on carjacking!
HR5353: (2) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—As part of the proceeding under this section, the Commission shall assess— (C) whether broadband network providers offer to consumers parental control protection tools, services to combat unsolicited commercial electronic mail, and other similar consumer services, the manner in which such services are offered, and the extent to which such services are consistent with such policies of the United States;
I'm telling you... This will open the floodgates to more government control & censorship of the internet. You're first paragraph makes it clear: This is a solution in search of a problem.
If that law against carjacking says everyone must purchase & install a camera in their car, so that "big brother" can protect us all from carjacking 24/7, then people other than those intent on carjacking would hopefully oppose it.
By the "logic" in your first paragraph, if you oppose a law that prohibits you from moving to another state, then your opposition is evidence that you intend to move to another state. Net Neutrality is completely unnecessary and a solution in search of a problem, but, please, go ahead sign away our freedom to the federal government. It's for the "greater good" right?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Government + internet = FASCIST CONTROL
Government should know it's place and STAY THE HELL OUT!
Can anyone post a shred of evidence proving that internet service providers are deliberately favoring one site over another???
If they're not going to monkey with the packets, then why would they mind writing a net neutrality commitment into law?
Right?
It's like passing a law against carjacking. What kind of people would oppose that law? People intent on carjacking!
(2) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—As part of the proceeding under this section, the Commission shall assess—
(C) whether broadband network providers
offer to consumers parental control protection
tools, services to combat unsolicited commercial
electronic mail, and other similar consumer
services, the manner in which such services are
offered, and the extent to which such services are consistent with such policies of the United States;
If that law against carjacking says everyone must purchase & install a camera in their car, so that "big brother" can protect us all from carjacking 24/7, then people other than those intent on carjacking would hopefully oppose it.