Global Warming Inconvenient Truth 01

Please keep all comments and debates civil, no vulgarities, ECT...

The Liberals global warming proposal doesn't significantly reduce greenhouse gases or slow the predicted global warming (which is largely natural), however what they have already set into place is destroying our economy and sovereignty.

The Liberals are destroying the economy, making big business bigger and sacrificing our sovereignty.

The Liberals talk a big talk about fighting big business, however in reality they are destroying US big business. What is the end result? The US economy and businesses take a big dive, the US manufacturing goes under so foreign manufacturing that doesn't have to meet as strict environmental and employment standards. The net result is less jobs and a worse economy in the US, a worse environment, and more sweatshop labor (often children) in foreign countries.

The Liberals are destroying our economy, making the environment worse, sending our jobs overseas, and supporting sweatshop labor and horrible working conditions (often for children).

The big businesses that the Liberals destroy in the US, are businesses that employ and pay poor people. The liberal policies are making the poor people in the US poorer (less self sufficient and more dependent).

Often the big businesses that the Liberals destroy in the US fragment and coalesce into even larger foreign businesses. The Liberals pretend to be against big business, however they are in fact breaking up US big businesses and making even larger foreign businesses.

The global warming scheme is destroying the US government and making a world government. Al Goreisim is undermining our country and Constitution. The carbon tax and open seas treaties proposals is nothing more than setting up the framework for taxation to support a socialist world government. Unfortunately the average person isn't smart enough to get it because they are so shallow and blinded with hate and greed.
The McCain-Lieberman and Bingaman climate amendments
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mlewis/050620

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Glenn
• Beck
• Bingaman
• plan
• Kyoto
• treaty
• S.
• 139
• 1151

[NCOMUSCLE]

C02 follows temperature not the other way around. C02 does not cause warming. Hitler seized power by blaming the jews; the Neo Fascist Left is seizing complete power and destroying liberty by blaming global warming.

[Schemefighter]

NCOMUSCLE:

Ditto. Except I would like to make a refinement.

The liberal fascist global warming hysteria is blamed on "big business" and America. The liberal fascists substitute the word "big business" and "big oil" for "Jew" to be more politically correct. If you replace the metaphors "big business" and "big oil" with "Jew" how similar they are to the Nazi agenda becomes obvious.

[Schemefighter]

NCOMUSCLE:

Fascist liberals are the biggest segment of neo-Nazis out there, they just have a more politically correct, intoxicating and less obvious form of Nazism

[Schemefighter]

If we were to slow or stop the natural global warming oscillation, it might allow more methane ice to build up, so that when there is a warming the release would be more catastrophic. That's why people should be careful about jumping on the global warming bandwagon. If we were able to discover a way to harvest and distribute the methane ice, it might help the environment, energy situation and financial situation. Al Gore's proposal, might actually be building a time bomb to extinction.

[Schemefighter]

I think we should sink some money into researching "methane ice". By some estimates there is more energy in methane ice than oil. Methane ice is also catastrophically released during natural global warming and impact events. It would be best to release the methane ice in a controlled useful manner than to just let it catastrophically release.

[Schemefighter]

Itsacorporatething: Actually by burning oil we might be gently contributing to minor global warming over a long period of time. However if we wait for a meteor strike, that would release the global warming gases suddenly that could lead to mass extinctions again. Burning oil at the rate we are now might actually be better for the environment than the alternative.

[NCOMUSCLE]

Sf, I defintiely think you are right on.

[NCOMUSCLE]

This is the way the Left "thinks"--cute polar bears (who will rip you apart) and funny penguins instead of FACTS. The fact is there has been zero warming in the last decade; and the last year saw a temparature drop overall that wiped out a hundred years of warming.

We won't even get into the Medieval Warming period cos the UN does not recognize the existence of the years 900-1300.

[Schemefighter]

Itsacorporatething: The idiots that blindly follow Al Gore and jump on the global warming bandwagon remind me much of people that want to throw water on a fire as a knee-jerk reaction. It's best not to have a knee-jerk reaction. Analogy: if you throw water on an oil, electrical, or some metal and chemical fires, it can actually make things worse.

[Schemefighter]

Itsacorporatething: If you let the free market take its path without molesting it too much. The transition to alternative fuels will happen more efficiently and naturally without. People will start using other fuels because oil is becoming too expensive. People will become more conservative because the price of energy is going up. Hopefully liberals will reconsider their moratorium on nuclear energy.