Hello Brian - Wave formation
Uploader Comments (IanCrossland)
Top Comments
-
Well aren't you the fucking comedian. Hey Ian, how about addressing the issue of your overblown ego? Ya know, that ego that compelled you to (most amusingly) try to lecture a physics professor with a doctorate degree? A man who makes money promoting square fish and cuts his nose hairs on TV lecturing a physics professor about physics? You need some fresh air in that bubble you live in.
All Comments (53)
-
The first of all water has viscosity but there is no viscosity within the gas your comparison make no sense. Do you know why gravity moves? there is lot more to it than just trace it with instruments see what is happening.
-
you know you said we can see 1/10th of a second to the future isn't it, it takes a minute for our brain to process the information to go through our synapses, receptors, nerves etc. ? :)
-
Sorry mate, but read any good book on Quantum Phyics, Marcus Chown is good, and you will see that there is so much more to it that your grade school level explaination.
-
The more these physicists try and explain the models, the more they reveal they don't really get it
-
mmmmmmm it´s better if you go as a waiter...let this to Prof Cox.
-
best example is a bouy on the water
-
this interlocuter has more body movements, than any scientific explanation of anything,
maybe he should join a Circus, as a clown
-
0,0000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000001 (the chance that someting bad will happen is much smaller) mulitplicated with "OO" (the possible damage is indefinite a possible "total loss" - destruction of the world = "OO" fault) leads to an "OO"=indefinite failure mode effect.. No medical product for human use would be accepted with such a risk and failure mode.....;-)
um, wasn't Brain Cox talking about the movement of spacetime with regards to gravitational waves?
not 'the correlation between the electromagnetic wave and the waterwave'
does electromagnetism cause ripples in spacetime?
joeglassfield1 1 year ago
@joeglassfield1 yes, but spacetime is a really general term. I think it ripples part of it.
IanCrossland 1 year ago
The closest picture of Dr. Cox's gravitational wave might be a compression wave moving outward from the center of an explosion. One can actually see it because changes in the density of the air affects the refraction of the light passing through the wavefront. For a gravitational wave it is space-time itself that undergoes compression and expansion. General Relativity indicates that changes in the distribution of matter induces changes in the surrounding gravitational field.
Nice try, Ian.
httprover 3 years ago 4
General Relativity is a geometric explanation of surface movement. It has been around for 92 years. See the background radiation. The matter and the gravitational field are produced by vibrational causation (nuance?). They are affecting each other on the surface undoubtedly; but go deeper to see the origins of the surface movement. (Then the origins will be clarified again and again and eventually quantum science will be a relic of past explanation.)
IanCrossland 3 years ago
Ian Crossland, the full time waiter, part time actor with a bachelor's degree in Drama telling Dr. Brian Cox, the physics professor, with a doctorate degree in physics that he is confused about waves.
I don't know why, but sometimes I'm still shocked by your enormous ego and self-delusion.
Michelle5451 3 years ago 15
Hey I only work part time as a waiter
IanCrossland 3 years ago