Krazy Kent talking about Carbon Dating (I guess he actually means all of radio-metric dating that he wants to ignore). Well, a listener calls up a radio station after looking over Hovind's sources and guess what happens...
This video will be continued in "Kent Hovind is Crazy #25" with a stunning video I found a little while back to wrap up Hovind's "understanding" (or more properly misunderstanding) of the scientific papers he cited.
Watch this continued:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DBFCA254B5D2BCB4
Audio from Infidelguy.com debate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SjaMcCgLbg
Download this video:
http://www.mediafire.com/?koimldzkodn
Hey, that's me on the Infidelguy Show!!! Thank you Trin80ty for putting my voice together with Kent's "facts"!
ScientiaPerceptum 11 hours ago
C14 isn't used to date fully fossilized remains, because the carbon that was in them has been replaced through mineralization.
The sad thing is that for many creatards, this Hovind nonsense is all they'll ever hear about "science.
Pathetic.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
Looking up articales that show when C14 doesn't work is not proof it does not work well when it is used correctly.
And it is not used to date fossils. It is used to date Egyptian things at sites 6000 years old and some older.
gregrutz 4 months ago
I like how Kent likes to use the idea that if any science is ever wrong, then all science is wrong. What's funny, is that the scientific method is a process that finds flaws and corrects for them, eliminating this type of concern.
However, it is exactly the argument that can be used against blind faith religions. Since there is no justification for the correctness of a
deity-inspired scripture, and some of these writings are obviously wrong, how do we know the others are right?
CasualTS 6 months ago
It's called quote-mining. And many many creationists have become famous for it
Spocktacular96 7 months ago