Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Kent Hovind is Crazy #24: Carbon Dating

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,616
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 29, 2009

Krazy Kent talking about Carbon Dating (I guess he actually means all of radio-metric dating that he wants to ignore). Well, a listener calls up a radio station after looking over Hovind's sources and guess what happens...

This video will be continued in "Kent Hovind is Crazy #25" with a stunning video I found a little while back to wrap up Hovind's "understanding" (or more properly misunderstanding) of the scientific papers he cited.

Watch this continued:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DBFCA254B5D2BCB4

Audio from Infidelguy.com debate:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SjaMcCgLbg

Download this video:
http://www.mediafire.com/?koimldzkodn

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Carbon dating doesn't work -- debunked
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey, that's me on the Infidelguy Show!!! Thank you Trin80ty for putting my voice together with Kent's "facts"!

  • C14 isn't used to date fully fossilized remains, because the carbon that was in them has been replaced through mineralization.

    The sad thing is that for many creatards, this Hovind nonsense is all they'll ever hear about "science.

    Pathetic.

  • Looking up articales that show when C14 doesn't work is not proof it does not work well when it is used correctly.

    And it is not used to date fossils. It is used to date Egyptian things at sites 6000 years old and some older.

  • I like how Kent likes to use the idea that if any science is ever wrong, then all science is wrong. What's funny, is that the scientific method is a process that finds flaws and corrects for them, eliminating this type of concern.

    However, it is exactly the argument that can be used against blind faith religions. Since there is no justification for the correctness of a

    deity-inspired scripture, and some of these writings are obviously wrong, how do we know the others are right?

  • It's called quote-mining. And many many creationists have become famous for it

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more