Skewed views of science

A look at the pitfalls of arguing against science from incomprehension or emotion.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• science
• incomprehension
• emotion
• guilt
• flawed understanding
• bias
• learning
• potential
• curiosity
• discipline
• knowledge
• educational
• religion

[Lyrero]

@stitch24021 Hi! I would like to advice you about Haramein's work. The thing is that he's not a scientist, as he claims to be. The reason is because he tries to mix what he thinks he know about physics and numerology, mysticism and faith, which is a crazy idea very far from what the serious international scientific communities in the world attempt to do. Go to the Wikipedia and read what 'unification of forces' actually means. Given your curiosity, please watch Cosmos of Carl Sagan. Enjoy! : )

[1Rectified]

So Should I just keep my mouth shut in class?

[ministeroftuba]

Great video, thank you

[pabobfin]

Brilliant piece, thank you.

[f50tube]

i can't believe i just found out today about these videos that have been around for 4 years..

[stitch24021]

if u want a wider understanding of science and what it represents, watch nassim haramein's unified field theory. what y understood is that science is another small bubble of understanding of reality and it's not ok when they say it's everything

[Samuelwhatshisface]

@vincentleest F=ma was newton's first axiom, and while it must be assumed to step into mechanics, stress analysis, dynamics, etc., it has been done so on the basis that F=ma has given reliable results. There are plenty of laws that aren't true in all circumstances; Hooke's law, Newton's law of cooling, even N2L (F=/=ma, but F=d(mv)/dt ). After all, why would we use the THEORY of general relativity over Newton's LAW of gravitation? Because the law is wrong.

[DryBones60]

Beautiful video. Just beautiful.