Launch of the HMAS "Canberra" ALHD-1 / Botadura del HMAS "Canberra" ALHD-1
Uploader Comments (BellumetPacemBlog)
Top Comments
-
@Panzerargentino es un buque anfibio construido en galicia y ahora estamos además construyéndoles dos portaaviones a Australia y a noruega a chile unos submarinos..
-
@1elgalle1 Los felicito, ya en el mundo no abunda el trabajo metalurgico especializado como ese.
All Comments (27)
-
Dentro de poco verás al HMS Camberra y al HMS Adelaide por las aguas de tu pais. Mejor que te vayas acostumbrando ^_^
-
Tampoco hace 200 años los yankees estaban en guerra, por ejemplo, te sirve también esta excusa? Eres un demagogo, y lo que es peor, un prejuicioso contra España, pero bueno, puedes decir todo lo que quieras, los militares saben lo que quieren, y optaron en un concurso por nuestra industria naval. Y si te molesta, pues te jodes, que esto es lo que hay
-
@LordBuntaro because spain has not been in a naval battle for 200 years, and i dont care realy about where the ships come from, the Arleigh burkes were actualy cheaper but had too many crew,we should have not ordered those carriers and just ordered those three ships and thats it, Australia has low unemployment and cant fill the crew positions,we are now taking english and american crew wich makes no sense and we must not even think about buying spanish subs as well.
-
You know more than the military of your country, who in a contest they have decided by the Spanish naval model?
-
And what hell makes you think that a LHD or a frigate built in Spain, are not suitable for an ocean like in Australia? What is the problem? Technically, which?
-
@LordBuntaro does not matter anymore, we have managed stop them taking up the option on the fourth f100 spanish aegis ship and after the trouble with using foreign crews to mann the ships they wont even consider another LHD , and all i was saying was that instead of those 5 ships we should have just bought three Arleigh Burkes as you probaly agree they are built for the biggest ocean in the world ,somthing spanish ships dont need to do.
-
Yours, is lacking in genuine credibility, because the only thing you have is done shit about our naval industry in all the videos about this ship, the BPE Juan Carlos I. You talk about waste, but you not say the same thing about the yankees ships. It is obvious your prejudices. By the way, because if you talk about lack of crew, people, etc, the BPE has high automation, for have the smallest crew possible. This is for your information and your demagoguery
-
@LordBuntaro look Australia should not buy these ships full stop, they were even talking of buying more but the greens put an end to that, we are the 6th biggest country in the world and only have 22million people in it, unlike europe we never had the recession so we have low unemployment wich means we have no one to sail these ships, they are fast tracking english sailors into Australia to sail these ships ,foriegn ships foreign crew it is a waste.
-
Did you not know that yankees did not know to put an Aegis system in a ship not less than an Arleigh Burke of 8000 tonnes, and that the Spanish engineers if they did, with creating our class F-100 frigates? Do you know that we are building submarines operated with hydrogen?
Less demagoguery and prejudices against a country which you don't know absolutely nothing. And supposing that you are Australian, that until I have my doubts...
-
Do you know our shipbuilding industry, to speak with such contempt? What you build in your country? What lessons intend to give us, asshole? If something I hate is the stupid demagogy of scum like you. Countries like Sweden navally have not combatted never (while Spain made it during centuries, and more as empire, when Australia was not nor an idea) and they make good ships
Parece el portaaviones invincible de la guerra de malvinas.
Panzerargentino 1 year ago
@Panzerargentino Sí, guardan cierto parecido.
BellumetPacemBlog 1 year ago