Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Guantanamo Bay

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,144
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 3, 2008

2008 Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader answers a question from the audience about his stance on military tribunals and Guantanamo Bay. From The Forum Auditorium, Cleveland, Ohio, October 30, 2008. Video by Karen Kilroy - http://karenkilroy.com

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • NO Expereince - NObama

    Keep America Safe

    Vote Nader on Tuesday!

  • im voting for nader tomorrow because my vote for obama would be wasted

Video Responses

This video is a response to Dreams of Tomorrow
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm tired of hearing that the Dems are chickens, they are not they are CO-Conspirators with Republicans to steal, kidnap and kill for their own profits and their corporate CEO constitutents; as seen through the eyes of Native Americans, African Americans, Mexican Americans and many women were not assimilated to think in terms of power, oppression, and violence. Of course now everyone is being propagandized to agree with the leaders through the media.

  • Not only is it common knowledge, but I have explained how Nader cost Gore the election at great length on this page. Please read my previous posts or google it.

  • gore lost his home state and clintons home state, how is that naders fault? gore just lost, dont blame nader for gores horrible campaign choices

  • he wasnt selfish, gore didnt win his home state or clintons home state, and you are blamig nader? what a joke

  • close Guantanamo

    STOP torture

    innocent people are being tortured, raped in Guantanamo

    STOP it now

    CLOSE Guantanamo

  • Irrelevant. Gore would have won New Hampshire, Ohio and Florida uncontested if Nader would have withdrawn.

    Nader is an accomplice to all of Bush's crimes

  • Except that it's been proven by independant recounts several times that if the recounts had been allowed to continue, Gore would have had Florida.

    It's also a known fact that the chair of the Republican campaign in Florida was the one who made up the voter rolls and disenfranchised hundreds of black and minority voters.

    And it's also a fact that the Supreme Court has a majority of Republicans, which voted to call the election in the middle of the recount when Bush was ahead.

  • Everyone knew the election was going to be within 1% or 2%. So instead of conceding his hopeless campaign for the good of the country, Nader decided to continue. Nader received 5% of the vote, of which 85% would have supported Gore over Bush.

    Nader could have dropped out & given the election to Gore but was too selfish.

    Nader is why Bush was elected in the first place.

  • He didn't give Bush the election, he didn't have enough votes, unfortunately. The Supreme Court handed Bush 2000 on a silver platter, thanks to his cousin and the corrupt vote machine company, and Kerry handed Bush 2004 on a silver platter by giving up.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more