JAS-39 Gripen vs JF-17 Thunder Comparison
Uploader Comments (HaroonAntibody)
Top Comments
-
Gripen is an original with a heritage.
JF-17 is a bit-copy like all Chinese designs to date. You can point at a part and say: that shape came from the F-16, that came from the F-18 etc. But that doesn't neccessary make the JF-17 a bad plane though. And the Chinese aren't interested in originality. They are greedy to take over the market with price dumping so they spy, copy and adapt.
Video Responses
All Comments (27)
-
@Hewleri JAS-39 IS FUCKING AWESOME
-
@Lovecramp SIMPLY I AGREE THAT THEY ARE COPYCAT
-
Ratio of price does not match up with quality, JF-17 is a multiple role air craft. it can be modified to be a ground attack.
-
There are none..... Gripen is a proven more tech advanced plane...
-
JF-17=School Buss, Gripen=Porsche.
-
@andersekap1 pff again something without back up.Give us proofs...Welcome to the dreamland of youtube
-
@Lovecramp Chinese are the future world super power.Keep that in mind.jF 17 has capacity for more versatile armament and payload.P.s its an LCA (the best in its category).Cheap dosent mean its crap.The cheapness of a product is directly related to labor cost which is much cheaper in china as compared to any other part of the world.China is the leading manufacture of computer chips and electronics and has sufficient modern facilities to build capable aircraft.The upcoming j-xx is an example.
-
design wise i love the jas-39 gripen i think it looks awesome and better than jf-17 but thats just looks. i think both have huge amount of potential.
-
@PakiEagle1 many bro well they have one pilot and one weapons guy so u know 2 brains are stronger than one
HaroonAntibody 1 year ago 7