Global Climate Change - Debunking Lord Monckton 5

I would suggest that the goal of the vast majority of these prominent climate change skeptics is to create doubt regarding the recommendations of the scientific consensus in relation to the impact of our carbon emissions on global climate change. This doubt, once entrenched in the public opinion would provide a brake on real progress towards legislation to restrict carbon emissions. The obvious benefactors of a lack of progress would be industries who would be forced to lose billions in profits by having to change their business processes and models to comply with stricter regulations. Do you think that it is likely that these anti-climate change advocates are being bankrolled by these industries? You decide?

This video is a mirror of potholer54 addressing the claims of Lord Christopher Monckton

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRCyctTvuCo

SOURCES:

0:18 "Apocalypse? No!" -- Monckton film, 2007

0:59 Myth of the cooling planets in potholer54's video "Climate Change -- Has the Earth been cooling?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc

1:16 "Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the last 11,000 years" -- S.K. Solanki et al, Nature Sep 2004

3:20 Cited by John Cook, http://www.skepticalscience.com/Do-500-scientists-refute-anthropogenic-global...

3:38 "What the sunspot record tells us about space climate" -- D. Hathaway and R. Wilson Solar Physics 2004

4:32 "Is climate sensitive to solar variability?" Nicola Scafetta and Bruce J. West Opinion piece at http://www.fel.duke.edu/~scafetta/pdf/opinion0308.pdf

4:41 "Can solar variability explain global warming since 1970?"
-- S. K. Solanki and N. A. Krivova, Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2003

Solar Activity and the Mean Global Temperature
A.D. Erlykin et al, Physics Geo 2009

"Solar trends and global warming" -- R. Benestad and G. Schmidt, Journal of Geophysical Research July 2009

"How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006" J. Lean and D. Rind, Geophysical Research Letters, Sep 2008

"Recent changes in solar outputs and the global mean surface temperature. III. Analysis of contributions to global mean air surface temperature rise" -- M. Lockwood, June 2008

5:24 Slide 96 "Could it be Solar?" http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/

5:49 "Meet the Climate Sceptics" BBC TV Feb 2011

7:10- 9:46 taken from posts in the forum of my Monckton Bunkum series of videos, and the videos themselves.

11:04 http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/

11:06 http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman3610

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Lord
• Christopher
• Monckton
• potholer54
• climate
• change
• global
• warming
• al
• gore
• energy

[itsasin1969]

What is most sad is that this OLD man is lying for a paycheck and it’s the young people that are left with consequences.

[stealthbadger]

Wait, did he say the surface of Jupiter???? WTF....

[RoelGeurtsen]

@krapptacular ahh so cute!

[RoelGeurtsen]

@itsasin1969 cool enough, not to scream fire!

[itsasin1969]

@RoelGeurtsen

Only if 97% of qualified scientists are wrong.

So are you cool with that Noah's Ark story too? 

[RoelGeurtsen]

@itsasin1969 No it is actually the other way around, as climategate showed it has been quite a joy to watch the entire man-made global warming fear movement disintegrate before our eyes.

[krapptacular]

I have one guy saying I am just to fucking dumb and nasty to talk to. wtf man.

I use to buy into lords shit untill i built up my skeptic skills. You people have helped me make those skils, even if i don't think so highly of human brains.myself. I know how dumb people can be and are. including me. I will go with the scientists that have studied it all these years.

Look I was a machinist, i use fix problems and fuck ups. But i was not skeptical at all.

[crraful]

@itsasin1969

There's no person as Lord Monckton. Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen's latest creation. Just look at his bulging eyes:D 99% of what he's saying is utter bull crap.

Epic troll is epic.

[Trevorthentcy]

what about all the false claims from the ippc. how soon we forgot the lies they put forth.

[GhenisCanne]

@Drgamedood

And your point is? I take note that the corruption and malfeasance of the IPCC gang is ignored, even supported, but my scientists have not purchase with you.. Galileo and Copernicus were single men fighting against the dogma of the church. Were they atheists? If not, did their faith fail them? Did the official atheism of Lysenko aid him?

Peace

[Drgamedood]

@GhenisCanne Intelligent Design IS creationism. All they've done is replace "creator" and "creation" with "Intelligent designer" and "design".

[WaxItYourself]

@GhenisCanne What the fuck do you think creationism is moron? Intelligent Design = Creationism. It is just rewrapped in a way to be offered to schools. Don't tell me you're a creationist too?