9/11 Truth Niels Harrit on Nanothermite Evidence GoodMorning Denmark

Professor in chemistry Niels Harrit talks about the Nanothermite found on GoodMorning Denmark.

Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7T...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Niels
• Harrit
• Denmark
• Professor
• Chemistry
• Nanothermite
• 9/11
• Truth
• Conspiracy
• Thermite
• Steven
• Jones
• Red
• Chips
• Controlled
• Demolition
• Richard
• Gage
• Inside
• Job
• False
• Flag
• NWO
• Mark
• Roberts
• Debunked
• Alex
• Ron
• Paul
• Media
• WTC
• Towers
• Primer
• Paint
• Obama
• Bush

[cycimian]

Problem in America is the same military getting rich off war owns the Media.

[nickstemoeilijk]

Great upload, thanks.

[Thetan1974]

@biggbrattz

Of course Harrit is an expert. You're just in denial, because you need to call every respected scientist and expert who finds science that points to an inside job "kooks".

Now, you have two assigments:

1) Prove what can create the same iron rich micro spheres that USGS and RJ Lee sorted out and which thermite so far is the only explaination of

2) Show us what paint or other substance contains these "explosive" iron micro spheres-creating chips

[bergssprangare]

The professor  is a thermi pervert

[biggbrattz]

Surprises me no end that a person presenting themselves as an expert can make such reckless statements. There are other SIMPLE expanations for the presence of these compounds. They are often found in fires where steel and aluminium are in close proximity. I am no expert....you don't have to be....this is easily verifiable. This man just ruined his professional reputation, and will likely find himself on the roster of the unemployed, along with Stevne Jones.

[Krackonis]

What he asks for is what we should all expect. A normal mass murder investigation. If you found 3000 bodies in a field, we would expect an investigation of those murders.

[BYTaipei]

I lke to know who get the answer of the follwoing: 這是一個簡單的問題， This is one simple question, 奈米科技有沒有遭到極權主義組織犯罪團體濫用的風險？ Is there a risk that nanotechnology abused by totalitarion organized crimes? 奈米科技在中華民國境內及境外有沒有公開及積極的防制濫用的措施­？ Is there any open and possitive solutions in works in Taiwan, Republic of China or internatonal society? 為什麼沒有？ Why not? 這是一個簡單的問題。 It is one simple question.

[8n4n08]

@CarnivoreEschelon So why would 'ignoring' the other contaminants invalidate his findings?, this is simply not the case, The point is that the there was a complex nano-thermite compound present, you can't avoid this. He started with a hypothesis (or not, doesn't really matter), found chips of an unknown material, analysed them and found them to be a highly complex substance, Fact.

The other study you point to had the specific purpose of discrediting his work, and suceeded, how scientific... NOT.

[CarnivoreEschelon]

@mujaku problem also he uses an acetlyne torch to do so. Also since not a single one of his samples have an chain of handling or are five years old. they are not the same grade of the USGS study that dis proves all of Jones work.

He specifically ignored all the other contaminates in the pulverized dust. and invalidated his findings.

[mujaku]

@CarnivoreEschelon The composition of red oxide primer paint used to prevent oxidation of steel beams is vastly different than the target compound that was tested. In addition, the primer paint at 800 degrees C remains stable. On the other hand, the target compound the Professor is talking about ignites at 430 degree C. There is a high probability that the target compound the Professor tested in nano-thermite.

[CarnivoreEschelon]

@codematrix

sorry to say but when you lack the ablity to look at the full picture and take into the research the fact that the rutproofing in the paint chips were misrepresented by ta group of scientist trying to prove controled demolition.