Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Controlled Demolition vs. WTC Collapse

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
66,587
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 7, 2007

Compare controlled demolition's MO vs. the WTC collapse

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 73 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (muzicmaker2001)

  • Hey, NIST didn't look for nukes and Tesla weaponry, either. Conspiracy, cover-up! ROFL.

  • @NotableJInx2

    Just a guess..but I think you don't find thermite when you're not looking for it, huh?

Top Comments

  • That was a nuclear demolition.

    The source: nucleardemolition.+com/GZero_R­eport.pdf

    The chemical analysis of dust fallout samples from the WTC: concentration of Strontium and Barium exeded the maximum level at least 300 times at epicenter(0.37%Ba,0.31%Str. by weight),the other places -40 times.The samples was taken from 35 locations on 0.5-1km radius.Quote: These are not trace amounts.They are highly dangerous and toxic amounts.Str.and Bar.are the major elements resulting from uranium fission

  • @muzicmaker2001

    Why should any scientist sign a petition opposing the truth movement, dim-wit?

    What's next? Geologists signing petitions against the young earth creationists and their dismissal of radiocarbon dating? Come to think of it, we have to organise a movement against the Flat Earth society, too! We have to refute their evidence!

    Jesus, are you THAT stupid? I can't decide whether I should laugh at you or just facepalm.

see all

All Comments (1,503)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NotableJInx2 or JamesCorbett911

    did you forget which sock puppet account you are using? Funny...and desperate

  • @NotableJInx2

    So, what you are saying is you have no support from experts outside of the official investigation? How can that be? This is so obviously an act of terrorism from 19 cave dwellers with the intelligence to outsmart the entire US military..seems logical to me.

  • @muzicmaker2001

    Why should anyone look for explosives when even demolition companies state there weren't any?

    Here's what actual ImplosionWorld says:

    "DID THE WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS ACTUALLY IMPLODE? No. They collapsed in an uncontrolled fashion, causing extensive damage to surrounding structures, roadways and utilities."

    "[...]there is no visible or audible indication that explosives or any other supplemental catalyst was used in the attack."

  • @MazJax

    I thought what you are really trying to say you can't find a number of scientists with their specific names given that wll sign any petition opposing the truth movement, correct?

  • @NotableJInx2

    12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

    NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.-NIST's FAQ Aug 30, 2006

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more