YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Airbus A320 crash at Habsheim airshow, France 1988

Gary C Gary C·16 videos
29
32,460
Like     Dislike 4

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Gary C's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Gary C's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Gary C's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jul 21, 2009

This was an Airbus A320 that crashed at Habsheim, Alsace, France on June 26th 1988. Despite what many people belive the aircraft was NOT being flown by a computer at the time. In fact it was being piloted by captain Michael Asseline, the aircraft was supposed to fly by at 100 feet but clearly it was lower. The captain stated in a post crash interview that his altimeter read 100 feet, despite this he felt the altitude was lower and he commanded the engines to full thrust. The engines did not respond in a timley fashion, an issue that had been encountered before on the Airbus A320 in fact this was only not proven because an AIRBUS official at the scene switched the flight data recorder for a blank one of the same type this was only found out several years after the captains imprisoment. Email me if you'd like to know more.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (Gary C)

  • Nik Hughes

    Am currently watching this on National Geographic, there were over 100 people onboard, pilot was flying low and misjudged, 3 people died...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Nik Hughes's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Nik Hughes's comment.
  • Gary C

    Thats correct, however it was more than merely the pilot misjudging, it is known that his instruments were not giving him an accurate picture added to the fact his engines were abnormally slow to respond.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.
    in reply to Nik Hughes (Show the comment)
  • benrosemberg

    he also happened to disengage one of the protocols of the fly-by-wire system which moves the throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude. I suggest everyone interested in this incident read up on "Fly By Wire" by William Langewische...Great read, covers this accident, and it lets you in on what really happened here...It is disputed, yes, but truthfully Asseline was playing around with a system he wasn't familiar with, and pushed its envelope further than he should

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate benrosemberg's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate benrosemberg's comment.
    in reply to Gary C (Show the comment)
  • Gary C

    "throttle to max to force the plane out of the stall attitude" any pilot will tell you that to VERy first phase of stall recovery is to bring engine power to flight idle, then lower the nose THEN and only then apply full power. The application of full power will only force the nose attitude to increase thus worsening the stall, the nose must first be lowered. And when your at only 50ft lowering the nose isn't really an option, thus stalls at low altitudes very hard to recover from.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.
    in reply to benrosemberg (Show the comment)

Top Comments

  • cheesemaster1000

    Anyone that says this flight was unmanned clearly know NOTHING about commercial aviation or for that matter aviation, period. You CANNOT fly a jetliner without a pilot! If you could airlines would have got rid of them years ago, why waste money on pilots? For God sake stop saying this was unmanned and start using some common sense!

    · 10

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cheesemaster1000's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cheesemaster1000's comment.

All Comments (50)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • mathfreak123

    Glad to read the video description, but can you add some periods in there? It was difficult to follow along with what you were trying to say.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mathfreak123's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mathfreak123's comment.
  • killmuster

    you'r exactly right , I know a lot about aviation , I went to a full motion flight simulator and flew an A340 .... and I did an exelent landing , and I say .. until now .. NO jetliner can fly all by it self , who's gonna taxi ? take off ? set the route ? caculate fuel preformance ? communicate with the tower ? talk to the passenger's ? and so on ... humen is a lot better that any very automated aircraft if that humen was a pilot

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate killmuster's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate killmuster's comment.
    in reply to cheesemaster1000 (Show the comment)
  • DeathSoljah4Life

    Are you for real?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DeathSoljah4Life's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DeathSoljah4Life's comment.
    in reply to SayaAensland (Show the comment)
  • SayaAensland

    I can't believe there are French people who actually say "ooh la la". I thought that was just something made up by foreigners.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SayaAensland's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SayaAensland's comment.
  • Zapster48

    Clearly the Illuminati were in control of this flight to discredit computers and pilots so that they could step in with the new creation Windows 3.0 to dominate the world! I read it on the internet so it must be true! ;p

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zapster48's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zapster48's comment.
  • blackycheckit

    Pilot error. Navigation maps didn't show the correct landscape i.e the forest. Equipment error. Known Airbus error in engine 'lag' below 100ft.. Pilots saw the runway too late so glide slope was all wrong and they were slowing down as they did the flyover. Air France mucked up the altitude. they specified 100ft. which was below the legal height for airshows, it should have been around 500ft.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate blackycheckit's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate blackycheckit's comment.
  • FoxAirfieldMaverick

    many would still say the plane was unmanned

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FoxAirfieldMaverick's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate FoxAirfieldMaverick's comment.
    in reply to bmwnasher (Show the comment)
  • Gary C

    This aircarft was flown by Captain Micheal Asseline google his name.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gary C's comment.
    in reply to razzler34 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later