Science Of God and His Word (Part 2 of 7)

For those of us who believe in a higher intelligence, how do we really know that there is one? For those of us who are certain there is one, how do we really know that our view of who he is, is even close to being accurate? In this 1 hour podcast (divided into 7 parts) we will explore the mechanics of modern science, astronomy and cosmology and physics to determine the existence of a hyper-dimensional creator and then use those same scientific discoveries to narrow down which human written manuscript might be a message to the Earth from the Creator Himself.


PART 1:
--Science & faith VS religion & blind faith.
--The 3 main views of reality.
--The observation of facts & filling in the blanks.
--The dangers of blind faith.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EyCDGxN360


PART 2:
--The latest observations in science,
astronomy, physics, biology and cosmology.
--How the behavior of the universe points to a creator.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c9TWvnNKtM


PART 3:
--Introduction to hyperspaces / hyperdimensions.
--The conditions that a human-written manuscript
would have to meet in order to prove itself to be
beyond the dimensional scope of the humans who
wrote it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuMJ4axzNAY


PART 4:
--The contemporary science of the Bible.
--Hyperspaces in the Bible.
--Time-warps in the Bible predicting the future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqtZxsUEYMs


PART 5:
--The holographic Bible with a large bit-rate, spreading out over a large bandwidth, in high resolution, high definition.
--The consistency of an integrated message system from outside time.
--The digital photo-mosaic effect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n6XoEww79E


PART 6:
--The message of the entire Bible condensed and hidden in the text of a genealogy in Genesis.
--More on the photo-mosaic effect.
--More on the time-warp effect.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcZk9V3dA1g


PART 7:
--The evidence of God's fingerprints in the text itself.
--The supernatural (or hyper-dimensional) engineering of the Bible.
--The best translations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpgHFwC5DfQ


Fore more go to:
http://www.FoundingWord.com/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• God
• Jesus
• Christ
• Christianity
• Bible
• Religion
• Founding
• Word
• Josh
• Allem
• Joshua
• joshallem
• Science
• Creation
• Evolution

[Pilotwing64]

I agree with pwr110. And Josh, you did say "distance" that is very different than "angle". Distance has virtually nothing to do with it. If it did, the 3.5 million mile difference between the distance from the earth to the sun at their closest and at their farthest would be perpetually shoving us into ice then inferno. You seem like a nice guy, but this first step seems to have been easy for you to make because you gave yourself license to assume anything if it proved your point.

[joshallem]

@Pilotwing64 If distance was irrelevant, then so would be the angle. I fail to understand why this is such a difficult concept to grasp.

[pwr110]

So many problems with this guys argument. 1. He claims the seasons are based on the earths distance from the sun...false. The seasons are caused by the earths tilt!!! This is so fundamental its saddening.

[joshallem]

@pwr110 Tilted in reference to...???? Ahem... THE SUN!!!! Thank you.

[WorldMoment1]

Do some research along Dr. Spitzers line at magisreasonfaith dt org

[Pilotwing64]

You clearly make all of these arguments to support the idea that the earth could not be even slightly closer to the sun or slightly farther away. Then when confronted with the idea of the angles causing the different temperatures and the fact that the earth's distance from the sun varies a huge 3.5 million miles throughout its orbit, you try to spin what you’ve already said to make it look as if you meant “angle”. You clearly did not mention anything about angle.

[Pilotwing64]

@joshallem The concept I'm having trouble grasping is how you could think that angle and distance are the same thing or that they are equal in this example. It seems like you are just trying to avoid having to you admit you were wrong. Just listen to yourself from 3:10-4:15. You state is so many different ways that the temperature difference is caused by the distances. You even say that a slightly bigger earth would be too hot for us to live on.

[Pilotwing64]

@joshallem I said distance has VIRTUALLY nothing to do with it. Obviously distance factors into it. But the difference in the distances between the poles and the sun and the equator and the sun is less than 4000 miles. If that made any significant difference in temperature we would certainly notice the difference of about 900 times that caused by the 3.5 million miles. We do not notice this. The angle is what causes the overwhelming majority of the temperature difference.

[pwr110]

@Huttate I think we are in agreement. You bring up a good question, what is the optimum configuration for a planet to sustain life, and how close is earth to that planet.

[Huttate1]

@pwr110 But it is not 'just right'. If the earth was the best a supreme being could come up with, he did a piss poor job. I am not a cosmologist but I am certain that a more optimum configuration for a planet could be found. Perhaps without the earthquakes, volcanoes, uninhabitable tundra and desert, etc.

[Huttate1]

Except that there are likely billions of planets in the universe that would be able to support life - and that is just those in a goldilocks zone.

The leap do DNA requiring a programmer is illogical and illustrates a basic lack of understanding of the biology involved.

I have never heard a scientist say we are lucky! Have you nut heard of the anthropic principle?

The earth is perfect for life, if you ignoring ice ages, earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, hurricanes, droughts, disease, etc,.

[pwr110]

@joshallem but fortuantely for the universe it has a extremely large number of opportunities and enough time. 50 billion planets in our galaxy , and 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe. 500 million of the planets in our galaxy are "hospitable" for life. 13.75 billion years...Probability not luck, given enough chances you will get a planet that can support life, then its just a matter of time.