How many times should you be able to destroy the world?
There are enough NUKES to destroy the world 10 TIMES OVER. Couldn't we dial that back to being able to destroy the world a mere FIVE time over, or THREE or TWO times?
twelvers are very dangerous in that they are in control of a Country trying to build nuclear weapons. the 9/11 hijackers were wahhabi idiots that belong back in the 7/8th century
anyone born in the US is not an immigrant you freakin moron, you listen to pandering politicians looking for votes, not wishing to offend any minority group so they talk stupid talk
an immigrant is one who is born in one Country and then movers to another to become a citizen
A couple of years ago we could have asked alot more Kurds but unfortunately you guys blew most of em up.
And by the way, there will always be nukes. No one can force you to get rid of them. Any one with a brain knows that the US and Russia are just trying to look good. Its all political posturing.
adam curtis my friends check for his docuemntary on youtube and get mind fucked
hansson2000 7 months ago
How many times should you be able to destroy the world?
There are enough NUKES to destroy the world 10 TIMES OVER. Couldn't we dial that back to being able to destroy the world a mere FIVE time over, or THREE or TWO times?
blueboyblue 7 months ago
another armchair intellectual...
1:36 Mubarack?
fargonbastedge 8 months ago
@genie0390
ha what a moron.
So the 12ers are bad but the wahabi's are just misguided?
Moron
Fullskip 1 year ago
@Fullskip
why don't you grow a brain?
twelvers are very dangerous in that they are in control of a Country trying to build nuclear weapons. the 9/11 hijackers were wahhabi idiots that belong back in the 7/8th century
anyone born in the US is not an immigrant you freakin moron, you listen to pandering politicians looking for votes, not wishing to offend any minority group so they talk stupid talk
an immigrant is one who is born in one Country and then movers to another to become a citizen
genie0390 1 year ago
...Think about it like this:
Do people really need anything besides food, shelter, water, clothing?
Does that mean they shouldn't have anything besides food, shelter, water, clothing?
UtubeMyAccountName 1 year ago
@UtubeMyAccountName
Your argument makes no sense.
The US should keep all its nukes (even though you have admitted it doesnt need them all) for the purpose of maintaining a national defense
But the US shouldn't give up some nukes it doesnt need for the purpose of maintaining national defense
Have i got it right? Or will you now commence the back tracking?
Fullskip 1 year ago
@Fullskip No you haven't got it right. I never said a single word about maintaining peace. That was somebody else's argument.
UtubeMyAccountName 1 year ago
@ConservativeTimes
A couple of years ago we could have asked alot more Kurds but unfortunately you guys blew most of em up.
And by the way, there will always be nukes. No one can force you to get rid of them. Any one with a brain knows that the US and Russia are just trying to look good. Its all political posturing.
Fullskip 1 year ago
@UtubeMyAccountName
Your argument makes no sense.
The US should keep all its nukes (even though you have admitted it doesnt need them all) for the purpose of maintaining peace.
But the US shouldn't give up some nukes it doesnt need for the purpose of maintaining peace.
Have i got it right? Or will you now commence the back tracking?
Fullskip 1 year ago