T-160 VS B-1 LANCER(ESPIONAJE)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,351
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2008

T-160 VS B-1 LANCER(ESPIONAJE)

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • pROBABLEMENTE ES COPIA, PERO LO SUPERARON Y POR MUCHO. a TAL GRADO QUE COMPITE POR EL PRIMER PUESTO ENTRE LOS BOMBARDEROS DE TODOS LOS TIEMPOS.

  • @999cheetos999 I added the F-15E link just because we discussed it before. That site also has all the varying bomb loads. The F-15E has 15 hardpoints, 2 avionics hardpoints, & can have even more on the wing rails.

    s362974870 . onlinehome . us/forums/air/index . php?showtopic=182918

    But also, the B-1B almost never uses it's external pylons. But can still carry more assorted weapons internally due to more bomb bays & more versatile bomb bays whereas the Tu-22M carries a wide variety of weapons.

  • @999cheetos999 Ha, small world. Didn't expect to see you here.

    A quick thing to mention about the Tu-160 is it's lack of weapons, & how it only launches cruise missiles. It only can launch 6-12 cruise missiles due to it only having rotary launchers & not internal pylons.

    Whereas the B-1 has 3 internal bays that are very diverse.

    targetlock . org . uk/b-1/weapons . html

    A quick note about the F-15E, these are the pylons:

    f-15e . info/joomla/en/weapons/weapons­-stores/122-external-stores

  • @PILUPACKSXXX Americans can see better than they can think. The RCS(Radar-cross section stealth)demands stealth aircraft to be shaped as follows(triangle or diamond).We all know that triangle is a horrible way to shape aircraft with (B-2) but the diamond shape is aerodynamically capable and requires little computer assistance to fly. The T-50 and J-20 follows this and ofcourse the WINGS will look the same as the F-22 (diamond),but everything else is different.Russia gave USA modern RCS anyway :D

  • @binaway Stalin wanted B-29's VERY BADLY. The USSR wanted to buy from USA, but USA banned the use of strategic bombers/exports in foreign states. What USSR did was steal from the USA, but who can blame them?It was replaced anyway with a much better bomber, the Tu-16. The Tu-160 was inspired from the Concorde and the wing design of the Tu-22/M. I can also say that the B-1B is a copy of the Tu-22 series :D. The Tu-160 SMC aircraft,its bigger,it uses anti-flash coat, B-1 is SB aicraft,small,black

  • Sí es una copia.

  • @PILUPACKSXXX yes the wright brothers copied it too,

  • @Example626 The Tu-4 was a reversed engineered B29 from four damaged over Japan which landed or crashed in the USSR. The foot pedals of the Tu-4 even had Boeing written on them as they were cast using B29 originals. The T-160 is only a copy of the B1 in that it was produced in response to the original B1A, which never entered production, which was much faster than the B1B. The fuselage of the T-160 is more like a Tu- 144 than a B1 although the wing arrangement is very similar.

  • russia coppied the design of the B1B, now they are copying the design of the F-22 on their friking t-50

  • @gtamodman122 this is very true.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more