Moya vs Nalbandian
Top Comments
All Comments (31)
-
@JL6293 ya but their idea was good. urs is not...
-
Well, it depends. Sometimes, conventions can be preferred simply because we "know" they work. Radical new ideas never take form until a pro proves it's successful. Moya, for example, was pretty much the first pro to use Babolat to success, and today, it's become a groundstroke/grinder's weapon of choice. The two handed backhand is generaly agreed to be better than the one handed backhand, but two-handed backhands, when they just took the scene, were ridiculous to the public.
-
@JL6293 if its advantageous then everyone will be doing that...
-
@JL6293 well i think the basic problem you would find is that you should change you racket from one hand to another every time the ball comes to your right or left.
-
That would require too much fine touch from the nervous system I guess. However snooker players like Ronny O Sullivan play with 2 hands as well
-
Nalbandian sure doesn't do well often against players with the intensity, athleticism, and determination to track down every ball, and willingness to keep playing. Sure he likes long rallies, but it doesn't really favor him when the opponent doesn't give up.
-
thenoblequran (Ctrl+Enter)
-
Nalbandian's backhand + Moya's forehand = God
-
phenonenal
-
Maybe it's too difficult to learn. I know a 6.0 player from a T.V. commercial who plays two forehands. I don't quite remember his name, however, the clip showed him very aptly handling both forehands in the middle of a match using an almost court level perspective. Was pretty interesting to watch.
moya is not any player, he´s one of the best veteran player´s on tour..he´s capable of pulling upset´s!
reefric 3 years ago 10
I've always wondered: why is it that no player has tried to learn playing 2 forehands? Of course on the return and volleys, stick to one dominant hand, but what about the groundstrokes? Is it disadvantageous to do so? Why or Why not? Please Reply.
JL6293 2 years ago 2