Meg Whitman: California is NOT for Sale
Top Comments
All Comments (507)
-
"Trying to disunite a family of grizzly bears." LOL! How true!
-
@Maxdwolf Not at all. I'm not a racist, but I happened to come across this completely out of nowhere. I won't be voting for either candidates because I'm not a resident of California. This video was recommended from an Oreilly interview... that might have a little more to do with the racist comments.
-
@Glitch667 lol yes she did !
-
1:33 Did she just water board that television?
-
how is she just buying ca?
-
@MrCman404 - your trying to make it sound like whitman is the joke here, what she spent on ads is less than a drop in the bucket compared to what the far left career politicans have spent in CA, in fact its so much CA literally can never dig back out, so what do the voters do ... vote the same damn people right back in, "i just think that is HILARIOUS", along w/ the fact you overlooked all that and and took a jab at whitman which has no real affect on the country
-
this girl is a fucking moron and has no clue what she is talking about, first off CA isnt for sale it was already sold long ago to the far left career politicans who spent CA so far in debt they cannot literally ever dig themselves out of, so what do the voters do ... vote them right back in and then act like whitman is the moron
-
did you hear california's her state, i dont think its for sale. wtf
-
I just think that it is HILARIOUS how badly Meg Whitman lost after all of that money she spent
-
@Sileni haha very true....it will never happen.....
HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!! Im SO GLAD she waisted her money , 140million , CALIFORNIA IS NOT FOR SALE ! IS NOT FOR RACIST ! IS NOT FOR SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT VOTE FOR 30yrs ! She should have given us $1000 for a vote, for someone who DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT GOV`T OR THE WORLD !
Again - HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!
toybb04 1 year ago 4
MEG WHITMAN = LOSER, HOORAY FOR CALIFORNIA ON NOV. 3, 2010!!!!!
HoboGus 1 year ago 3