Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Intelligent Designer Exposed: Who is the Manufacturer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,283
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 15, 2009

This video is Part 2 of the Intelligent Designer Exposed. Please watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0kk0iGBSEE prior to this video for the full effect.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (C0nc0rdance)

  • It is unfair when your videos make a diabetic hungry!!

  • Don't blame ME! Blame the Keebler Elves and their delicious fudge covered creations.

  • Haha, I almost choked on my food on this one :)

  • Warning!

    The manufacturer of this video is not responsible for injuries sustained in the course of normal viewing. The viewer assumes all responsibilities for choking and/or throat obstructions. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states. : )

    Thanks for the comment FTF!

Top Comments

  • LOL. You're hilarious! I can't believe you even suggest that creation even qualifies as a "hypothesis." lol. The definition of hypothesis is "an educated guess, based on observation." There is no educated guess and it's not based on anything other than an observed book. lol. Keep the laughs rolling...

see all

All Comments (129)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • [Homer]Mmmmm....Chips Deluxe cookies....[/Homer]

  • @TaiFerret I'll try to re-ignite the discussion: Care to elaborate, indeed.

    What does a programming rule-of-thumb have to do with determining the number of potential supernatural creators?

    Plus, using the program analogy, it would actually support the opposite argument: a program (= creation) is made by many programmers, working towards the same goal. there well could be 5412 programmers, working on different sections of the simulation... which would explain a few things :P

  • @TaiFerret

    Care to elaborate?

  • @dookiecheez The Zero-One-Infinity rule.

  • Highly unlikely, but I think the only way that ID could be true is if we are all part of a computer simulation.

    I realize that's Matrix territory, but it makes sense. The programmer would be powerful indeed, undetectable to people trapped in the program, could skip ahead or behind in time at will, and might be either sadistic towards his Sims-like minions or simply uncaring to the 1s and 0s in his machines

  • One of the basic problems with proposing an intelligent agency is that one can on equal grounds propose any number of intelligent agencies. If there is a designer, why not 5412? If there is a soul, mind, and brain. Then why not an ultra mind, a super soul, and a mega brain--all of which are supernatural.

  • @perfectshot77

    What does "before" mean if these is no time? In practical terms, there was no before the universe. Again, we all have a hard time grasping this idea intuitively, but time-space begins asymptotically at the Big Bang itself. There cannot have been a "before".

    How do physicists explain the origins of our universe? There are four good models that are currently in use. Why don't you do some research and see if you can find them?

  • @perfectshot77

    What you have to get used to is that your intuition is inadequate when it comes to understanding cosmology and quantum physics. You can boggle at the idea that time did not exist until the Big Bang, but that is a prediction of a well-supported theory.

    Likewise, your inability to imagine a bottom up process of creating complexity is because you have no experience of it. Your intuition has nothing useful to say about processes that take eons or occurs at high energies.

  • @perfectshot77

    What came before the Big Bang? Both time and space were a consequence of the initial state of the Big Bang, so there was NO "BEFORE" the Big Bang.

    Words have specific meaning. Intelligent means capable of thought. No scientists denies design in nature, the question is simply whether that design is the result of natural forces or supernatural forces. Since we can actually measure and test natural forces, science focuses on that explanation, and has been very successful.

  • Damn that was a good video. Btw I need to get me a FSM for my car.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more