Muse Thoughts of a dying atheist

Live @ Trabendo, Paris

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Muse
• trabendo
• live
• Thoughts
• dying
• atheist

[Scudsy101]

Looking at the comments you wouldn't think you're watching Muse live,hahahaha!

And just because he uses the word "atheist"!!

[Aralayna]

This song makes me want to touch myself.

[thealmightycommenter]

get the words right matt ;))

[12345ISIS12345]

@bbhatmaker I wasn't fustrated, but you are saying the same bullshit again and again so I can't be botherd to debate anymore.

[bbhatmaker]

@12345ISIS12345

And I should like to apologize for frustrating you. It was not my intent.

[bbhatmaker]

I'd be interested in hearing those proofs, you've done nothing but prod at my thinking and illustrated nothing to defend your position.Using human jobs as analogies for God is nothing new-God's been related to being a Father, then an Architect, a Watchmaker,and now a Programmer. As we find ourselves capable of creating more and more complexed artificial creations, so should we better understand how a God may have a relation with us. Many atheist proofs rely on misunderstandings of that relation.

[12345ISIS12345]

@bbhatmaker You know I'm not even going to bother replying after this because your just saying the same old load of bullshit. The only basis your argument has is philosaphy, mine has fact andv has every human as proof (well almost) philosaphy isn't a basis, It is a question that no-one has or can answer so until you come up with a better argument then I don't intend on posting any more comments.

[bbhatmaker]

@12345ISIS12345

That brings up an interesting thought (going back to the virtual analogy)-would a virtual being residing in a virtual world realize their existence was not actual-or would it seem real to them?Is reality relative?Does God see the physical world as a false reality(I think most religions suggest this to be the case),but we, knowing nothing else, see it as real?I think therefore I am, but is what I am what I see? This has the danger of becoming an existential discussion...

[12345ISIS12345]

@bbhatmaker How does that satae that there is no such thing as physical, If I hold a cup in my hand, and I know it's their because I can see it and feel it, and you can see it too, that is the basis, it doesn't need backing up, If you said oh that cup isn't there when it clearly was then your argument would have no basis.

[bbhatmaker]

@12345ISIS12345

According to most atheists, you cannot prove a negative claim. What I've stated is not theory, it's an hypothesis that seeks to reconcile modern skepticism with theological philosophy. The reason it has more basis than yours is because we see what I have shown within our own experience, especially when dealing with realities we create in the virtual - or at least, we can if we dared. Yours is without such.

[bbhatmaker]

@12345ISIS12345

What is real? Although, it doesn't really matter how you define it, I never said He couldn't - In fact, I do believe I stated He is without restriction. The analogical relationship between virtual and physical and physical and spiritual is just that, an analogy.

[12345ISIS12345]

@bbhatmaker It is not more bassless because there is more to disprove your theory than mine, saying that there is a spirital world that is out there sounds fundemental, It is not narrow minded not believing in spirits it called being logical. and realistic.