Twilight was BAD, m'kay?

It seems everyone saw this movie all at once! I've seen a few other vids on Twilight as I was putting this together (which took me about 3 hours to do- gotta love that learning process!)

Many may not agree with me on this, and I am not crying out for abstinence or anything (boy do I know better!) but I just don't feel this is a good example for young girls. Call me crazy, I can take it!

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Twilight
• Edward
• Bella
• stupid
• bad
• awful
• waste of time
• bad role model
• young girls
• love addiction
• vampires
• teenagers

[Sjazz87]

Um there are a few things you did not touch on that I think you should have. One, EDWARD IS A FREAKING VAMPIRE!(Can't believe I'm actually saying that) Bella knows this, and instead of running away screaming "OH MY GOD DON'T EAT ME!" like any sane person, she says "DO ME RIGHT NOW!" And I'm pretty sure if he is undead that it is considered nercophelia. Also, Edward is so abusive. He freaking breaks her car so she can't hang out with her friends, so she will stay with him. LAME!

[choirgrrl]

@Sjazz87 Considering he's, what, a hundred years old or so (?) wouldn't their relationship technically be illegal in most states anyway? I've never pondered the necrophilia issue, but I have to admit you're right... and it's damn creepy! Lol

[TheReptilianElite]

My daughter is only 8 and I could've killed her grandma for letting her watch this crap! Now it's her favorite movie... I haven't even seen it yet but I had a feeling it wasn't appropriate for an 8 year old! Her grandma also buys her Bratz dolls knowing how I feel about it, so go figure...

[choirgrrl]

I'm pretty open about most movies and allowing my kid to watch them... but I'm with you on this one!!

[epicenur]

Guys, you are all getting it wrong! It's a stalking pedophile vampire, remember? She's 16, he's 100+

[choirgrrl]

@epicenur *is laughing literally out loud* This is the best anti-Twilight argument I have seen so far!

[jussts]

"Superficial flaws"... you mean like being a 100 year old, undead stalker? Three strikes and you're out, Edward.

[lilacshine9]

You are so right about this movie. It sure sends the wrong message & you know it affects the way young ppl think even though its not real. I totally think the 1st one was just really bad in terms of acting, effects, character, story, sense, ect. but the others were better. I sure couldnt understand why the vampires didnt have fangs.

[sashajw1234]

@Sjazz87 "if he is undead that it is considered nercophelia"

LOL!

[Sjazz87]

@JTChess Not to mention he would have no semen

[Sjazz87]

@JTChess Yeah, not to mention semen.

[JTChess]

@Sjazz87 More important problem: He's a vampire, and thus doesn't have blood flowing through him. Thus, maintaining an erection would be impossible.

[arachnophile01]

I could only read the book on the premise that it was just build up to the second, which I could nt sit through as it was even worse. If you've ever known a teenager that does nothing but whine about how their life sucks and then go on to do stupid shit, imagine one is bitching at you for 500+ pages about a creepy vampire stalker who wants to drink her blood but whom she sees NOTHING wrong with, and you have the Twilight saga. And guess what, this turns out FINE for her, I'v heard.

[solshine26]

@choirgrrl It's only illegal if she's under 16 and they're having sex. Otherwise, a 16 year old can date a 120+ year old if they want to legally.

[TheHomelessCripple]

@TheReptilianElite The movie isn't appropriate. Bella sounds like she's having a small orgasm every 10 minutes and there's plenty of sexual undertones. Plus it's rather violent. At one point a gang attempts to rape the Bella in a parking lot.