Sen. Coburn Presses Kagan On "Natural" Law
Loading...
Loading...
1,012
Loading...
Uploaded by MediaMattersAction on Jun 30, 2010
learn more at politicalcorrection.org
- 6 likes, 0 dislikes
-
- 2:07
Elena Kagan on Inalienable Rights - "I've never really considered that question."by ApologiaTV2,308 views
- 20:51
Dr Coburn questions Kagan's personal view of the Constitution in day 3 of the Judiciary Cmte hearingby SenatorCoburn2,161 views
- 0:41
Farting Politics - Senator Tom Coburn Questioning Elena Kaganby SoOutThere1,207 views
- 5:49
Capt. Pete Hegseth Testifies about Kagan's Treatment of the Military at Harvardby RepublicanSCOTUS158,314 views
- 4:44
Santorum: We Should Be Able To Stop Gays From Getting Married Without Calling People Bigotsby SuchIsLifeVideos70,398 views
- 1:21
Cornyn: Kagan's 'Separate But Equal' Policy On The Military at Harvardby 831johna347 views
- 6:01
Lindsey Graham Questioning Elena Kagan - 2/10/2009by impietease29,889 views
- 0:48
Coburn, Kagan Clash On Final Day Of Confirmation Hearingby TheNewsOn6266 views
- 3:13
On 2nd Amendment, Kagan Won't Say Whether She Believes in Natural Rightsby RepublicanSCOTUS20,421 views
- 3:00
Elena Kagan won't admit to Orrin Hatch she wrote something but admits its in her handwritingby rightscoop2,184 views
- 2:38
Barack Obama Misquotes the Declaration of Independenceby NewGovt1,081 views
- 1:19
Kagan Declines To Say Gov't Has No Power to Tell Americans What To Eatby RepublicanSCOTUS459,048 views
- 2:50
STUNNING Kagan: "I don't have a view of what are natural rights."by conservativeco693 views
- 1:19
America's got Talent: Hip Hop Violinby xMidnightAlicex183,921 views
- 6:01
Ronald Reagan Articulates The Perils Of Big Government (aka The Democrat Party)by DarcPrynce6,534 views
- 1:48
Mario Savio on the operation of the machineby cherumaz67,903 views
- 6:53
Dr Coburn's last remarks to SCOTUS nominee Elena Kagan on day 3 of the hearingby SenatorCoburn842 views
- 1:56
Kagan Won't Rubber Stamp Declaration of Independenceby judicialnetwork8,698 views
- 8:23
McEnroe vs Gerulaitis USO 1979 Final - 06/11by MrJohnMcenroe550 views
- 1:08:21
Natural Rights, Enumerated Rights, and the Ninth Amendmentby caseschooloflaw1,522 views
@OlSpazzy Not a religious litmus test, but an American litmus test. Her job is to interpret the Constitution and she must understand the Founding to do so. The Declaration of Independance created the country and was the basis and justification for creating an American government.
Natural law regards individual human rights that are given by the "Creator" or Nature or whatever you wish to call it. Even Atheists can value Humanity.
AN IDEA Not neccessarily religious, but neccessarily American.
Doubro1969 1 year ago
I think she really meant .... "If you're fortunate enough for me to be concerned" with peoples "unalienabe rights"
Doubro1969 1 year ago
In other words. "Senator..........you'll have to give me truth serum to get the real answer you are looking for".
vederchi 1 year ago
@Francebrasil, no, two are right, you nasty prick.
ShaytanBozorg 1 year ago
@ShaytanBozorg You're wrong on all three points... What's new???
Francebrasil 1 year ago
@Francebrasil, you're a fucking moron, a radical yourself, and probably not even American.
ShaytanBozorg 1 year ago
@OlSpazzy
>She was perfectly in line to dodge his bullshit question
How was it a bullshit question when it was trying to understand inherent rights and her from own personal perspective? It is a simple and valid question. Sorry you deem it bullshit.
Your point on xenu law makes no sense either.
SoOutThere 1 year ago
@OlSpazzy This is why his questioning is ENTIRELY relevant. If she doesn't believe we have inherent rights (Dec. of Ind.) then she believes all of the freedoms we enjoy are because the govt ALLOWS it. I'll bet you understood this concept well when GWB signed the PATRIOT Act.
SecondAmdmt 1 year ago
@OlSpazzy Obama was correct when he said "the Const. is a document of negative liberties". It was DESIGNED this way to prevent govt from infringing on peoples rights. Those rights are inherent and not GRANTED by the govt. If the govt can grant rights, it can take them away. This is also true with separation of church and state. The framers wanted to prevent the govt from infringing on our rights to/from religion, NOT keeping religion out of govt (do some honest homework).
SecondAmdmt 1 year ago
what an asshole
todoke 1 year ago