Tim Hawkins - A Homeschool Family.flv
Uploader Comments (charles0322mrsdani)
All Comments (14)
-
@dingoembryo Apparently, you are a troll. You could say that the study of evolutionary claims is part of my job. Whatever type of evolutionist troll you may be, I do not know because it deviates so wildly from the rest of your religion. It is apparent that I have struck a nerve and your tiny sham of a world is now exposed. It's a shame to see you've lowered yourself to critiquing grammar in a feeble attempt to gain ground.
"Claiming to be wise, they became fools" - Romans c1v22
-
@dingoembryo Evolving laws of physics are necessary for creationism to explain away the "starlight problem." Young Earth Creationists claim the speed of light was once infinite and has been slowing down during the past 6000 years, thus explaining how we can measure light coming from stars in the billions of light years scale. Mind you, there's no evidence for this. But there is faith, and faith proves anything, however ridiculous it might be.
-
@theAdvOkiT At the very least, familiarise yourself with the topic you are attacking. Evolution doesn't say human evolved from monkeys. Only creationists make such an uninformed claim. I suggest you read up on the subject and come back and see how truly idiotic your comments sound to anyone capable of telling the difference between “your” and “you're”. Especially the gem about the laws of physics evolving....
-
@dingoembryo You yourself believe monkeys began to talk one day and your upset about one talking snake? Tell me, which evolved first male or female? What were the first elements to be formed and why aren't they evolving today? What about the laws of physics that would have allowed for the bang? Where did they came from and why can't they evolve today? Why do we find petrified trees standing up through supposedly “millions” of years worth of layers? Evidence indeed...
-
@theAdvOkiT Ultimately neither you nor I know exactly what how it all came to be because neither of us was there. But just because we don’t know something, it doesn’t mean we have to appeal to primitive-man explanations involving talking snakes, rib women, magical trees, and domes of water hanging over the world. Science is clear that the Big Bang is a theory, but a theory backed up with a lot of empirical and testable evidence. The expanding universe can be proven, can talking snakes?
-
@takealongline You mean like the creation of matter from nothing which therein defies the laws of cause and effect....like science that says, "BANG! everything came from nothing!" That sure sounds like supernatural reasoning for our existence.
-
@takealongline You've never actually researched Creation science have you?
-
I'm homeschooled and I'm in 9th grade and it's AWESOME! and yes I think those are all his kids
-
Are those all his kids?
@charles0322mrsdani By “real science”, I mean science which does not rely on the supernatural for its conclusions.
takealongline 3 months ago
@takealongline I like to be open minded and consider all possibilities.
charles0322mrsdani 3 months ago
It's spelled "humorous", not "humerous". And no, not all homeschoolers learn about creation. Some learn real science.
takealongline 3 months ago
@takealongline that depends upon what your defiinition of "real science". Are you talking about looking at the evidence around you, studying, doing your own experiments, and making up YOUR own mind or are you talking about just accepting what some expert says is the truth (and changing that every year or so)? I prefer to make up my own mind instead of following what another decides.
charles0322mrsdani 3 months ago
Thanks. I am a dreadful speller. Sigh, it is a fault of mine I am trying to correct. I bought a dictionary that I keep by the computer now.
charles0322mrsdani 3 months ago