NASA - FAA Conduct Airline Crash Tests

On December 1st, 1984, a remote controlled 4 engined transport jet took off from Edwards AFB, CA and crashed into a barren patch of nearby desert. This Controlled Impact Demonstration was a joint R&D program by the FAA and NASA. The FAA designed the C.I.D. to underscore results of exhaustive research in two areas of aircraft safety: improved crash protection and reduced post-crash fire hazards.Despite the fact the crash did not go exactly as designed C.I.D.did achieve its primary objectives.The analysis of C.I.D. data continues. The CID's crash wothiness tests were as important to the FAA as the fire safety tests. The crash protection objectives were: 1st: To obtain data on impact forces and their transmission thru the structure to the seats and occupants. 2nd: To evaluate the performance of existing and advanced energy absorbing seats. 3rd :To compare tests used to predict structural behaviour with an actual crash. AMK (anti-misting kerosene) fuel was employed in the test. The FAA has examined AMK's potential for protecting commercial transports from ignition of misted fuels. All research indicated that AMK would be effective in preventing this problem. The C.I.D. was an opportunity to use AMK in a realistic, impact-survivable crash.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Airline
• Crash
• Plane
• Fire
• Explosion

[sideslide23]

they should do the crash test on the new Airbus A380 because it is a big airliner.

[morphix007]

very nice

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism

1st Thermite

2nd missile on plane

3rd expensive nanothermite.

4th drone planes

again sometimes theorists only have these and have radio commentators become full bred professors.

dismisses little details like fuel tank fire/fume retardants and improved airliner and fuel designs.

again thermite has aluminum and iron. obviously the same materials used to manufacture WTC.

dont expect a cartoon plane cutout in impact, expect office furniture to survive a 500mph impact.

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism i am just mentioning and pre-empting what you might say, but not putting it in your mouth.

funny you say i get fed by media when LC uses media footage!!

also LC forgets that media had to talk even though info isnt clear, i have an understanding how media operates and its very different from what you theorists think they're paid to lie, again they had to yak it out even though info isnt clear so i may agree that media isnt accurate, but then its their fault.

[IExposeMormonism]

@nakazatoGTR You need to stay focused. I never mentioned S Jones. and fusion effects from shaped charges has been a reality since c 1947. What ever the truth is,it's not what you believe or what we were fed by the media. As for Loose Change, its been useful in exposing the truth. Which, again, is much more sophisticated that diaper headed troglodytes running amuk with rusty razors in hollow beer cans

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism ...another one of so many conflicting theories, and you master radio commentator cum "Professor" Steven Jones now has a new cat, tactical light nukes!! wow.

tell me how many versions of loose change are there and tell me how many "truths" were edited since the first edition?

if you guys believe one theory is the truth then, why dont you guys stick to that theory and stop smacking one after the other when the old theory fails?

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism calling people ignorant just because they dont agree is really very childish and a lackluster debate attempt

i dont give a frak how many frak-ups like you have been bitten into the THEORIST bug, well i got to give it to you people you are good at advertising, lying and making yourselves look believable.

nano thermite retains the same slow burn properties. aluminum and iron are basic components but both materials are actually used to build the WTC...

[IExposeMormonism]

@nakazatoGTR You're a complete ignoramus. Research nano thermite before you make claims. And Nano Themite found under scanning tunneling electron microscope has been ignited. ctv911 isn't a false expert, it's a channel with original videos of the WTC event. AE911Truth has some 1400 members now and excellent videos. Shaped charges have been used to produce fusion effects since c. 1947. Regular thermite is on youtube and it acts differently than yours, science guy.

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism " Nano Thermite is a proven reality. It was applied liberally to the WTC. It doesn't act the way you describe it,"

i make my own thermite for my own science-y stuff that will make your nose bleed and thermite of any type cannot cut through steel trusses. whats more effective are shaped high explosive charges which REAL Demo teams use to demolish steel structure.

you got no facts in your brain thats why you want me to see:

AE911/CTV911/LC.

full of false experts. hah

[IExposeMormonism]

@nakazatoGTR You need to get up to speed. Nano Thermite is a proven reality. It was applied liberally to the WTC. It doesn't act the way you describe it, so just give it up. Study the subject. For education go to AE911Truth and watch physicists, explosive experts, architects, describe a Truthful Reality. Go to ctv911 and watch hours of "official" videos of WTC/911. Watch all the known WTC hit videos, documentaries, demolition, construction techniques, etc. And get back in touch

[IExposeMormonism]

@nakazatoGTR "Inert fume retardant".Did U know this test involved using a British flame retardant?Nano Thermite is real and it's in all tested dust samples. UR opinion matters not. No Boeing could do what we were deceived into believing. Thank God groups like AE911Truth are here to expose the truth. Most of us listened to TV. Even Architects and Engineers. But a little prodding and they suddenly awoken.Don't you find it odd this planes wings were shredded and broken on impact w/ w2 puny rippers?

[nakazatoGTR]

@IExposeMormonism nano-thermite? i thought that thing would be too expensive more than just rigging a plane. so that line of logic is crappy.

thermite is easily affected by gravity and burn downwards unlike what you believe that burns horizontally, a photo you people based on was a truss cut by a torch DAYS after the incident.

"few frames then exploded"-uhm thermite does not explode ehem.

come on. you are simply copying crap from CTV and LC.

also how many aluminum foil layers are u wearing?