The Best tennis point in Wimledon 2008 - Nadal Vs Federer

Rafa Strikes again!! Poor Federer!!!

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Nadal
• Rafa
• Roger
• Federer
• Wimbledon
• Final
• Tennis
• Fuzy
• Yellow
• Balls
• 2008
• Wilson
• Balboat
• Vamos
• London
• Engish tennis club

[KaneMaestro]

He can cry all he wants, there is only one god, there is only one king and that is RF!

[simobgbgbg]

@KaneMaestro RF or RaFa

[87Logitech]

@simobgbgbg

RF logo for Federer :):D Federer best of all time , and that s it

[simobgbgbg]

@87Logitech I said that to oppose u lol! I now what Rf is but after Nole and rafa appeared RF can' do shit! He was lucky to be at his peak at a time when there wasn't any real rivals? Tell me who was on RF's level before Rafa appeared? Sure he is one of the greatest but without any real rivals who wouldn;t be! lol

[BrianCuber]

@simobgbgbg I disagree, at now Federer will lose to Rafa and Djokovic, that's right. But that's mainly because RF is getting old. If you put a 25-years-old Rafa and a 25-years-old RF to a match, RF surely will win. Let's take 2006 Shanghai Master Cup as an example, both of them are in their peak and RF still came up with great shots to defeat Rafa. I am not saying Rafa is bad, but you can't say RF can just do a shit. RF, Nalbandian and Hewitt, 3 of them have some classic match between them.

[simobgbgbg]

@BrianCuber RAFA wasn't at its peak until 2008 Wimbledon! Before 2008 he wasn't as good as he is now on hard courts!

[ShakyRabbit]

@BrianCuber To be fair, Rafa was no where near his peak in 2006. Rafa and Nole are pushing each other now so hard that they are better than they ever were. Just watch Australian Open Final 2012 or US Open Final 2011 and you'll understand.

[maripyter]

@BrianCuber

But during the same year, when as you put it both of them were at their peak, Nadal destroyed Federer on clay. And it's difficult to call RF the best of all time as he's never been really successful on clay, which is an important surface. He grabbed French Open title in 2009 only because he did not play Nadal.

[TheMartinito]

LO MEJOR ES EL SMASH DE NADAL QUE DEVOLVIÓ ROGER SIN DUDA !

[TheDestino999]

@eli9748 I think it's in line with a noble spirit to boast out about an easy victory upon a QUARTER of your main rival at the end of a season in which your champion (for he IS a champion) didn't win ANY title...

[TheDestino999]

@BIGBANGxSHINee 1) You can't actually compare two careers until they are both finished, and Federer is older than Nadal 2) You can take the two players at their best and I say that best Nadal BEATS best Federer 3) If you sum up all the technical abilities I think they would finish in pair 4) Nadal wins matches that seemed lost, Federer loses matches that seemed won 5) The former owns the latter for mental attitude, and WON all the High Tension clashes

WHO IS THE BEST???

[Songs2Tennis341]

The crowd is just like Grand Slam Tennis on Wii!

[toast749]

he didnt have rivals? well yep, he was just too good :D

[gos0anik]

Whoever says Fed was lucky..to be in a weak era... lemme solve the paradox for those dickheads...lets say fed was in a weak era...tht means he had many flaws...which wd have been punished in todays times...okhay..tht makes him an average player... lolzz...n rafa beats him quite a few times...so be it...rafa beats an so called average player only..so how the hell he becomes a great!!... :)).. am nt even bringing the skewed ratio. of surface meetings between the two...

.

[qwejss]

@simobgbgbg is it true that there's no true rivals at RF's peak? how about we say that RF simply demolished every single player effortlessly at his peak, and so no real names are remembered except RF? for example, if RF and RN haven't had got their fame long time before this year, they will also be thought of as nobody when Nole is dominating this year, and only Nole will be remembered. Then your theory will kind of suggest that there's no real rivals in 2011 and disregard Nole's domination

[zack21100]

@BIGBANGxSHINee Federer did, in NO way, dominate Rafa when he first came out. The first match they played, in Miami, Rafa won handily 6-3 6-3 when Federer was just reaching dominace. Federer has never been able to win 3 matches in a row against Rafa and never will. Rafa on the other hand defeated him 5 times in a row in 2006, one of Federer's best years.