Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Former IRS Agent Joe Banister and Ron Paul On CNBC

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
139,775
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 19, 2007

Former IRS CID Agent Joseph R Banister
and presidential candidate Ron Paul discuss the illegality of the income tax on a 2004 edition of CNBC's Special Report with Maria Bartiromo.

Watch Aaron Russo's AMERICA: Freedom To Fascism for free on Google Video to learn more about the illegality of the income tax.

  • likes, 28 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,376)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Federal Govt is ruling America with the end of a gun barrel of it's own citizens ... they will murder you if you refuse to be arrested and imprison you and treat you worse than the treatment of a child mollester!

    The Federal Govt is poison to the average American!

  • @endthedrugwarvision

    Better luck next time.

  • @RetSquid Wow bro. If you say so!  Rflmao!

  • @endthedrugwarvision

    AAWWWW.. did the wittle dwuggie get mad at the smart man? Maybe when the wittle drwuggy gets sober he can have an adult conversation?

    BTW, Godwin's Law. You lose.

  • @RetSquid Yes I agree that the court system in the USA is Saturnalian, a.k.a. Satanic selfish stupid myopic slaver rapist torturer, and that's to put it lightly. How about we take everyone that works for the courts and make them pay our taxes you nazi cunt?

  • @MsLawman7

    You do realize that your argument that 'wages are not taxable income' has never won in any court in the U.S...ever?

  • @MsLawman7

    And they said that wages are taxable income, go read my post again.

  • In December, 1996, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of O'Gilvie vs. US. In a six to three decision, the court held that punitive damages received as part of a wrongful death award were not excluded from taxable income by IRC. Sec. 104(a)(2), which excludes "any damages received on account of personal injuries."

  • @MsLawman7

    Here is another one for you from SCOTUS:

    "It also excludes from taxation those damages that substitute, say, for lost wages, ***which would have been taxed had the victim earned them.***"

    O’Gilvie v. United States, 519 U.S. 79 (1996). (emphasis added)

  • @MsLawman7

    No, I have posted SCOTUS rulings that define income and you read only the part that you think agrees with your ideas. Your claims about 'compensation' are wrong, wages and salaries are income and compensation, therefore they are taxable income. Section 1.414 itself says that it does not apply unless another section references it directly.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more