Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Irwin Goldstein vs Women's sexual health-Not scientific article published by Journal Sexual Medicine

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
73,686
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 7, 2010

Irwin Goldstein has censored this Letter to the Editor! Declaration of Sexual Rights: The right to sexual information based upon Scientific inquiry! The hypothetical area named G-spot should not be defined with Grafenberg's name; the G-spot is only an hypothesis without scientific bases. The orgasm is a normal psycho-physiological function of human beings and every woman has the right to feel sexual pleasure. The female orgasm should be a normal phase of the sexual response cycle, which is possible to achieve with an effective sexual stimulation by all healthy women. Clitoral/vaginal/uterine orgasm, G/A/C/U spot orgasm are terms that should not be used by sexologists, women and mass-media. The roots of the clitoris correspond only to the crura of the clitoris, they are attached to the ischiopubic ramus covered by the ischiocavernosus muscle, for this it is not possible that they are in contact with the anterior vaginal wall: the vagina has no anatomic relationship with the clitoris. To describe the cluster of erectile tissues (clitoris, bulbs and corpus spongiosum, labia minora, corpus spongiosum of the female urethra) responsible for female orgasm, the correct (and simple) anatomical term is female penis. Sexologists should define as making love, making sex, the case in which the orgasm happens in both partners with or without a vaginal intercourse (Vincenzo Puppo 2005). See other videos in newsexology

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (NewSexology)

  • ebook: Vincenzo Puppo. La sessualità umana e l'educazione a fare l'amore. CON AGGIORNAMENTI 2011 (47 figure), in wwwAMAZON

  • New: Puppo V. The G-spot does not exist. Response by V. Puppo to the article "O. Buisson: The Gspot and lack of female sexual medicine. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2010;38:781-84". Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2011;39:266-67. see in pubmed... g-spot is a scientific fraud?...

see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This doesn't surprise me. Dr Puppo deserves a reason from Irwin Goldstein as to why he rejected Dr Puppo's manuscript. I know why newsexology you already said it many times on your channel female and male g-spot don't exist they are only a business. The problem with the G-spot is that Irwin Goldstien and(sexologists, reg people,even a few MDs) are now PERSONALLY INVESTED in the g-spot its all about money and personal opinions or belief in the g-spot.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more