Classic Car And Driver - The Mazda RX-7
Loading...
20,675
Uploader Comments (aaroncake)
Top Comments
-
135hp!!!... Man, i got a 618hp 3 rotor 1st gen.... I bet they didn't knew this car would fall on our puertorican hands.. hehehe
see all
All Comments (33)
-
Australia still had new rx7's in 2001 not 95
-
my first car was a 1985 gsl teal blue i loved it so much never broke on me
till i crashed it street racing with my dad so dont street race in a mazda becouse there will be one less we need to preserve them iam sad now!!!
-
haha i bet felix wankel would shit himself if he knew that lol
-
my dad's cosuin has the very 1st RX-7 on the west coast of the US, he still owns it if i remember correctly, though it hasn't run since the mid 80's =(
Loading...
Its crazy that back in the day all major manufacturers had bought patent rights to build the wankel / NSU rotary. Nissan, chrysler, GM, Ford, Toyota you name it. They all scrapped their designs during the oil scare in the late 70's early 80's.
Imagine if they didn't?
pallymeat 2 years ago
That's the excuse they made, but I'm betting they simply gave up because they weren't willing or capable of making the engine work. Even Mazda struggled at first. Then Mazda had no trouble selling RX vehicles throughout the 70s and 80s.
aaroncake 2 years ago 2
I'd like to think that if the 3rd gen Rx7 was released today, it would have no problem fetching the $40-$45k pricetag.
Deetroiter 3 years ago
Only if it was reliable. If Mazda junked the twin turbo system and used a small modern ball bearing turbo (ie. GT30 size) the car would make a lot more power, weigh less and be infinitely more reliable. I always wonder why Mazda spent so much R&D on making the twins when they could have just spent that money on a better single turbo...
aaroncake 3 years ago
@aaroncake With Twinturbo-setup you get better low-end torque, which makes it more enjoyable and economical to drive. This way Mazda was able to attract more customers and better sales.
Auruura 10 months ago
@Auruura That's why Mazda developed the system, but the implementation was flawed. Going with a more modern turbocharger instead of one designed in the 60s would have been a better choice than developing a sequential turbo system around two ancient turbos. Unfortunately hindsight is 20-20 and engineers sometimes don't see the whole picture past their specific goals.
aaroncake 10 months ago