Part 1/7 - Interview with a nazi ss officer - franz suchomel - Discussion of treblinka gas chambers
Uploader Comments (HistorySpeaks4Itself)
All Comments (1,720)
-
wahrheitfuerimmer com/Treblinka htm
Institut for Historical Review (IHR)
-
When I first saw this, I thought it was very interesting and appeared to be 100% genuine. Until I read the facts and how much money he received. Unfortunately it is a lie.
-
@HistorySpeaks4Itself and if a man accept to kill innocent people because a former austrian decorator became fuhrer of germany decided it surely is a great person who will never accept money to gave an interview ... sorry for my english
but it's incredible how negationist still try to say that it's all jew propaganda .
-
Anyone here know is this interview in the film Shoah(1985), or is it a stand-alone production ?
-
The German BND is the renamed 3rd Reich GESTAPO.The BND had organized the delegate Scheuermann of our county to visit or home.To allow him to personally experience how my brother and our parents had been tortured.The BND continued to torture my brother.He was assassinated on July 11th2009.Half a year after the assassination of my brother the CDU delegate Mappus from our district town Pforzheim was made prime minister of the German land of Baden Würtemberg
The CDU is the ruling party in Germany
-
So let us know when we can see and read the results of this survey won't you...
" took ground samples and ground radar images of the whole "camp" .. and found... NOTHING"
So that begs the question...if the survey whas never been published, how do you know?
Cheers
-
to sabbathian- you stupid foolish. Take a big hammer and beat yourself at your stupid empty head. Ty pierdolnięty,zajebany tępy chuju,żeby cię kurwa szwaby w Treblince podsmażyły na ruszcie to inaczej byś zaśpiewał, debilu.
-
and in 1999, Australian scientists went to Treblinka, took ground samples and ground radar images of the whole "camp" .. and found... NOTHING! There was no camp there!
A few questions about this film: Why has Claude Lanzmann admitted that the German 'witnesses' of this film had been paid 3.000 deutschmarks (a considerable sum of money in the 70's) to 'testify' in his movie? Do 'History' and 'Truth' need money to be told? Wasn't money the first purpose of those late 'confessions'? Why are we lied and said that the video camera was hidden in a bag (what is obviously not the case)? What else are we lied about?
kazan188 2 months ago
@kazan188
The inevitable realm of the denier: conjecture.
Instead of asking hypothetical questions about what would motivate a man to accept money to provide information, you would be better off asking questions that are based in fact, like "where did 6,000,000 people go if the population of other countries was not increased by that amount?"
But if you insist on living in a land of guesswork, answer this: Why would none of suchomel's family refute his testimony? Did he "lie" to them as well?
HistorySpeaks4Itself 2 months ago 4