The last 12 seconds of the alleged flight UA175 - refined

check out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN32cH...

There are huge discrepancies in the speed estimations, in the description of the impact angle and flight path. At the same time there is very little description about the way these data were analyzed.
The high decorated MIT described it but used a method that added failure on failure (horizontal path, straight path, POV rectangular, Doppler effect...). Every conclusion was the assumption for the next conclusion (and so on) and increased the error of the result.
Finally, the MIT result of 503 mph had an error of about 100mph. The NIST result was about 50mph better but still bad. Btw, they estimated the overground speed of a straight line - no wind, no descend, no turn... The reality looked a bit different.

• Category

  News & Politics

[themoviescreator]

Something hit the towers,but it was really an airliner since the buildings were demolished by explosives as the witnesses said?and the fact that many witnesses have confirmed that it was not an airliner? if the impact is really congruent with the law of physics,why the wings enter inside the buildings without making gashes?and why any video has an impact's explosion completely different?all this make me think...

[themoviescreator]

Yeah I understand what you mean,but try to reverse things,if it was the tower to hit the plane at high speed,which one would be shattered?double layer steel specially designed to withstand impacts planes that is penetrated and then destroyed thousands of pieces?cos specialists can not only say that the planes have penetrated the building for speed,but they also say that they are the ones to collapse 250 thousand tons of steel in few seconds,and we already know that they lied about the collapse..

[saultrain]

The material of the plane is not what matters. What matters is the mass and speed of the plane which will determine the force at impact, and the tensile strength of the steel facade. The planes were not hollow they were fill with fuel, people, and cargo. The wings were fill with fuel. The numbers have been run numerous times by physicists studying the WTC disaster. There's no debate within the physics community. The impacts were 100% congruent with the laws of physics.

[themoviescreator]

From Logic my friend,aluminum is lighter than steel,wings empty aluminum can not cut steel beams filled without breaking,they said that the planes were like a bullet to the towers,but if you think about it,the bullet penetrates the body is to lead,while the body is made of flesh instead,this is why the bullet penetrates the body causing collapse,cos the projectile is harder than the body that penetrates and not the opposite,more wings come without patches in the clips,you know what i mean?

[saultrain]

How do you know that "aluminum don't cut steel"? On what do you base that information?

[themoviescreator]

Yeah,you're video as your words are interesting,it seems that the shadow dissapears from wing and we see clearly the wing of the plane...but aluminum don't cut steel,in the Fairbank's video you can see that they entering without gashes,I think...Military plane=Missile Cruise,not Hologram but Special effects,this is why they enter without gashes,but if the goverment and the Nist lied about the charges,then they lied in aircraft...is it possible?

[saultrain]

There are other reasons also. Check out my video "Debunked: Disappearing Wing of Hologram CGI Plane" and read the description. You will see why the plane appeared black to people.

As far as the building collapses, that's a different topic than the plane, isn't it?

[themoviescreator]

Yeah it's possible,the plane was going very fast,it was undoubtedly difficult to view it,do not put into question,but the government had also said that the fire were brought down the building,why hundreds of people saw and heard explosions of explosive charges that day?

watch?v=svDgpLLcavo

and yet another version of the Nist is not right...do you see?

[saultrain]

I've seen that video. The evidence presented has been cherry picked, and there are reasonable explanations for why people were confused by what they saw.