[Higher Quality] CBJ goal disallowed at Nashville Predators - 2/27/11

Columbus Blue Jackets forward Derek MacKenzie appears to knock the puck past Nashville Predators goalkeeper Pekka Rinne, but the NHL war room in Toronto confirms a controversial on-ice call of "No goal" after a review that spanned over nine minutes in an NHL game on Feb. 27, 2011. Also, the NHL video review process straddles the border between ridiculous and laughable.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• cbj
• columbus
• blue
• jackets
• nashville
• predators
• nhl
• derek
• mackenzie
• goal
• 2-27-11

[ToastyMangoz]

wtf is wrong with the kid in the stands in the bottom right corner from 0:24-0:54

[Hossified]

Rule dictates if you cant clearly see the puck cross the line then the rule on the ice stands There is no angle that shows the puck over the goal line. Its unfortunate logic cant be used but those are the rules. Chill out people

[mustbeburtreynolds]

@GreenDayClass2013 A better system would be to have an implant in the puck that sends a signal to a responder in the posts, but then you have the problem of the implanted pucks going into the crowd, losing the league lots of money each time. That was why they ended the stupid FoxTrax glowpuck system in the '90s, because the pucks were too expensive to waste.

[razorslice17]

That's a fucking joke. The NHL is turning into shit because of the officiating.

[pbstar74]

@Hossified Here is my argument on this, though. You can see the player pulling the puck out of the net. If he is pulling it OUT of the net, it MUST have gone IN. A 3 year old could figure that out. The other issue is that the referee who made the initial call was in no position to make such a call since he was on the opposite side of the net where the shot took place. It's a case of using common sense, it really is not that hard.

[sucharadder]

YOU CAN see it. Little black disc.....it is not what you dont want to see-,..it's there-,...open your eyes...3:27-3:28. We are chilled.

[cronin098]

"Nashville won 3-2"

"Rick Nash scored two goals?!"

[ltt989]

@Hossified

Also they could add laser beam that goes from one end of the net to the other, then if the puck crosses that line, the beam is interrupted and we know no doubt that the puck went in. Thumbs up to petition this idea to the NHL.

[ltt989]

@Hossified

Yeah I know what you mean. A lot of time time that rule makes sense, it's like you're innocent until proven gulty type of thing. but then you get these giant fuck ups too. But sometime mentioned something really important. They did used to have camera INSIDE of the nets, that would have really helped in this situation.

[silver2zilver]

At around 3:24-3:26. For a split second you'll SEE the puck go from inside the net, under the goalies pad.

By common sense it was in, and there's even a camera view of the puck BEHIND the line being pushed forward under the pad.. It's a split second view, but with their cameras and ability to slow it down. That should have been clear to the fags in Toronto.

[Data782andSamy0]

Are you kidding me? Open your eyes NHL

[tmlms1313]

@Mytrollacount1 not all tv broadcasts have them, generally only the nationally televised games, or big market teams