Milton Erickson

No description available.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Milton H. Erickson

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

It's unlikely that you ever will, now that you have all your little personal investments in your little schemes and set-ups regulating your daily adaptive life set up.

I'll leave you on this note: if you REALLY want to HELP people using hypnosis, get over yourself first. This is not about YOU. You need to develop some basic respect for the human mind and other human beings before imagining you can help them.

HONESTY! Is that also a laughable notion to you? Hmm? Bye.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

...this, had never had the occasion to actually consider these issues, and you were, in a way, caught off guard. You're not used to communicating with intelligent individuals who are NOT promoting a set of values (trust authority) that have completely taken you over, and you are now posting in a frantic damage-control fashion. Indeed, the real problem here is much deeper, you haven't figured out a number of things about the paradigm you're operating under.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

Are you really content with absurdly insipid phrases such as: 'there should be only one ruling principle-the patient's welfare.'

WHO INDEED DECIDES what the patient's welfare is? Hmmm?

Milton has stated his priorities, I conveyed them, these priorities are CLEARLY psychopathic, what more is there to say?

Nothing, which is why you're slurring and spinning though I'll add that I feel somewhat sorry for you, and I mean REALLY sorry: you weren't prepared for...

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

'Ignore contradicting quotes and bash them as „feelgood phrases“'

Pfft, you're obviously not sufficiently intelligent to even understand what Erickson HIMSELF is saying about hypnosis. It's very simple: I provided Erickson's OWN words, in the introduction of his OWN book, explicitating his OWN vision for the main uses of hypnosis. That you can't deal with this and need to resort to all sorts of desperate ploys just shows how dishonest you are.

[quellimpuls]

@suddenlyitsobvious - ready? cleaned up all the NWO slobber on your floor?

OK ..

thank you for providing Stripper's strategy outcome no. 3 for keeping the good old NWO trance alive: Ignore contradicting quotes and bash them as „feelgood phrases“. Do not forget to pee some strong verbal odor marks in direction of the dump cattle before you leave.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

*yourselves

*about

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

And of course, you can both convince yourself that you're doing it for the best of purposes...

Really, if you can't identify an immoral freak, are actually scorning at the very notion of morality while discussing hypnosis, what does this say about you? Aboput your conceptions of the human mind?

You don't have any. You're following techniques that you don't even understand because you can't take an honest look at yourself first.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

..address the issue of morality in such a frivoulous way, indeed as if it were something belonging in the realm of religious supersitition RATHER THAN BE AN INTEGRAL, ESSENTIAL, CRUCIAL PART OF THE VERY PROCESS & PRACTICE OF HYPNOSIS shows WHY you failed to identify Erickson's blatant immorality You have no business invading minds of others if self-aggrandizing immorality is your ultimate.motivation -& it is.

You'll find a plentiful supply of passive victims though.

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

'Wearing strong moral glasses in general works fine for context Strippers lost downdownunder in their muddy everglades, where spooky fogs of control waft over dark blue waters ..'

And really, what's THIS...?

Wearing strong moral glasses indeed. The entire issue under contention was PRECISELY Erickson's immorality in the first place. That you as a hypnosis-fanatic, no doubt savoring the sense of personal power over deluded victims it confers you, would...

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@quellimpuls

'He did so, indeed.'

Case closed. Bringing up feelgood phrases from the rest of the book doesn't change one jota from his utterly condemning statement. You're just spinning.