Kingdom Under Fire: The Crusaders Theme 2
Uploader Comments (DWFTW)
Top Comments
-
Yeah thumbs down for you, retard.
-
I think there's a balance between the games. Overall, Heroes was easier than Crusaders, but there were individual missions in Heroes that were ridiculously tough, at least for me. Like the last mission in Walter's campaign against the Encablossa.
I thought Crusaders was WAY more fun, though. It was just... better.
All Comments (66)
-
@Rith9789 Pff. Morene is ugly as shit. But I was jk jk about Dark Elves.
-
No my hard-on was for Morene. hothtohtohtohtoht
-
Thank you for uploading, ve' searched so long....
-
This game was really awesome, the music was very cool and the action was brilliant. Heroes was also very good. Can't wait for KUF II
-
I think that this game is perfect. Medieval-fantasy age, metal/rock music, estrategy, action, swords. Crap... this is a dream, a perfect dream...
-
the "k.u.f." series, along with "otogi" 1&2, are the most underrated games on the original xbox. also "thief: deadly shadows". they are all fantastic games!!!
-
@BoringProjects Same I got Heroes when I was 8, got the demo in a mag and got it when it came out, few months later I found Crusaders and thought that it was the sequal lol. Never played Crusaders though. Heroes will always be my favourite :P
-
Who said knights, magic and the power of rock didn't work together?
:D
-
@watcherofthings Look at the size of the cover guy's Pauldron, and say that again.
Pauldron: Shoulder Guard.
Crusaders was a pretty hard game. Needless to say; Urukubarrs campaign in KuF:Heroes was that only one that compared in difficulty to any of the Crusaders campaigns.
SerialVelocityVH 1 year ago
@SerialVelocityVH The main reason for that really is those side mission parts in Heroes. Could do over double the missions throughout it, getting a lot more Exp and Gold, thus making it easier.
In basic terms, there are a few I'd say are about even in difficulty.
DWFTW 1 year ago